Skip to content

ref: use baseclass implementation of monitor creation - #74806

Merged
asottile-sentry merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
asottile-no-need-to-override-monitor
Jul 24, 2024
Merged

asottile-sentry merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
asottile-no-need-to-override-monitor

Conversation

@asottile-sentry

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

this fixes an error in mypy 1.11 where the baseclass implementation is not compatible

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 23, 2024 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.15%. Comparing base (7f1026a) to head (48a3f1a).
Report is 8 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #74806       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   57.10%   78.15%   +21.05%     
===========================================
  Files        6728     6738       +10     
  Lines      300098   300470      +372     
  Branches    51618    51672       +54     
===========================================
+ Hits       171376   234838    +63462     
+ Misses     123944    59312    -64632     
- Partials     4778     6320     +1542     

see 2011 files with indirect coverage changes

@asottile-sentry
asottile-sentry merged commit a745187 into master Jul 24, 2024
@asottile-sentry
asottile-sentry deleted the asottile-no-need-to-override-monitor branch July 24, 2024 13:21
asottile-sentry added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2024
an absolute ton of work went into enabling this -- but after this PR
model types / create / update / etc. should mostly be typechecked
whereas they were entirely unchecked (everything `Any`) prior to this.

most of the core problem was that mypy and django-stubs did not
understand our custom `BaseManager` and `BaseQuerySet` since there's a
significant amount of django stuff that goes into making those classes
"real"

fix that involved these issues:

- python/mypy#17402 (worked around)
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2228 (the workaround)

with that fixed, it exposed a handful issues in django-stubs itself:

- typeddjango/django-stubs#2240
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2241
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2244
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2248
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2276
- typeddjango/django-stubs#2281

fixing all of those together exposed around 1k issues in sentry code
itself which was fixed over a number of PRs:
- #75186
- #75108
- #75149
- #75162
- #75150
- #75154
- #75158
- #75148
- #75157
- #75156
- #75152
- #75153
- #75151
- #75113
- #75112
- #75111
- #75110
- #75109
- #75013
- #74641
- #74640
- #73783
- #73787
- #73788
- #73793
- #73791
- #73786
- #73761
- #73742
- #73744
- #73602
- #73596
- #73595
- #72892
- #73589
- #73587
- #73581
- #73580
- #73213
- #73207
- #73206
- #73205
- #73202
- #73198
- #73121
- #73109
- #73073
- #73061
- getsentry/getsentry#14370
- #72965
- #72963
- #72967
- #72877 (eventually was able to remove this when upgrading to mypy
1.11)
- #72948
- #72799
- #72898
- #72899
- #72896
- #72895
- #72903
- #72894
- #72897
- #72893
- #72889
- #72887
- #72888
- #72811
- #72872
- #72813
- #72815
- #72812
- #72808
- #72802
- #72807
- #72809
- #72810
- #72814
- #72816
- #72818
- #72806
- #72801
- #72797
- #72800
- #72798
- #72771
- #72718
- #72719
- #72710
- #72709
- #72706
- #72693
- #72641
- #72591
- #72635


mypy 1.11 also included some important improvements with typechecking
`for model_cls in (M1, M2, M2): ...` which also exposed some problems in
our code. unfortunately upgrading mypy involved fixing a lot of things
as well:
- #75020
- #74982
- #74976
- #74974
- #74972
- #74967
- #74954
- getsentry/getsentry#14739
- getsentry/getsentry#14734
- #74959
- #74958
- #74956
- #74953
- #74955
- #74952
- #74895
- #74892
- #74897
- #74896
- #74893
- #74880
- #74900
- #74902
- #74903
- #74904
- #74899
- #74894
- #74882
- #74881
- #74871
- #74870
- #74855
- #74856
- #74853
- #74857
- #74858
- #74807
- #74805
- #74803
- #74806
- #74798
- #74809
- #74801
- #74804
- #74800
- #74799
- #74725
- #74682
- #74677
- #74680
- #74683
- #74681


needless to say this is probably the largest stacked PR I've ever done
-- and I'm pretty happy with how I was able to split this up into
digestable chunks

<!-- Describe your PR here. -->
@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 9, 2024

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview — 48a3f1ae Deployed Jul 23, 2024 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants