Skip to content

Just to trigger - #8

Closed
mdiep25 wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
mdiep-test
Closed

mdiep25 wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
mdiep-test

Conversation

@mdiep25

@mdiep25 mdiep25 commented Nov 17, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Signed-off-by: Minh Diep minh.diep@intel.com

@daos-jenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@mdiep25
mdiep25 force-pushed the mdiep-test branch 7 times, most recently from 56cc1c0 to a0a5a6d Compare November 17, 2017 23:12
Signed-off-by: Minh Diep <minh.diep@intel.com>
@mdiep25

mdiep25 commented Nov 17, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

testing

@daos-jenkins

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@mdiep25
mdiep25 force-pushed the mdiep-test branch 8 times, most recently from 5f3f73c to d4ca69b Compare November 18, 2017 00:13
@mdiep25

mdiep25 commented Nov 18, 2017

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

just one

@mdiep25
mdiep25 force-pushed the mdiep-test branch 4 times, most recently from 0a58fdf to 951b00a Compare November 18, 2017 00:23
@mdiep25
mdiep25 force-pushed the mdiep-test branch 2 times, most recently from 41a6dad to d4cc914 Compare November 28, 2017 01:14
Signed-off-by: Minh Diep <minh.diep@intel.com>
@johannlombardi
johannlombardi deleted the mdiep-test branch August 29, 2018 20:53
jolivier23 added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2020
#8)

clang-format doesn't work on older clang compilers.   Rather than
skipping the step, instead use fallback of Mozilla if the version
isn't suitable.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Olivier <jeffrey.v.olivier@intel.com>
jolivier23 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2022
#8780)

It is possible that the error is not reset to 0 when a process is retrieving the private event in a multi-threaded environment since another thread might have processed the event completion.

add a lock on daos_event_t for events that are not part of an event queue, including the thread private event. This is required because in a multithreaded environment like dfuse, the event can be completed and the error set non
atomically, while the main thread sees the completion but before the error has actually set, causing the owner of the event to reset the event error, with the other thread setting the error after. this affects future use of the event that launches with ev_error already set to the previous error.

Signed-off-by: Mohamad Chaarawi <mohamad.chaarawi@intel.com>
jolivier23 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2022
#8779)

It is possible that the error is not reset to 0 when a process is retrieving the private event in a multi-threaded environment since another thread might have processed the event completion.

add a lock on daos_event_t for events that are not part of an event queue, including the thread private event. This is required because in a multithreaded environment like dfuse, the event can be completed and the error set non
atomically, while the main thread sees the completion but before the error has actually set, causing the owner of the event to reset the event error, with the other thread setting the error after. this affects future use of the event that launches with ev_error already set to the previous error.

Signed-off-by: Mohamad Chaarawi <mohamad.chaarawi@intel.com>
liw added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2022
Makito and Samir observed the following assertion failure after
restarting engines.

  #0  raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #1  abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #2  __assert_fail_base () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #3  __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #4  pool_map_get_version (map=0x0) at src/common/pool_map.c:2852
  #5  ds_pool_get_version (pool=0x7f0ca063c690, pool=0x7f0ca063c690) at
      src/include/daos_srv/pool.h:296
  #6  pc=rpc@entry=0x7f0ca0998d30, p_rpt=p_rpt@entry=0x7f0ca83a77b0) at
      src/rebuild/srv.c:2101
  #7  rebuild_tgt_scan_handler (rpc=0x7f0ca0998d30) at
      src/rebuild/scan.c:954
  #8  crt_handle_rpc (arg=0x7f0ca0998d30) at src/cart/crt_rpc.c:1654
  #9  ABTD_ythread_func_wrapper (p_arg=0x7f0ca83a78a0) at
      arch/abtd_ythread.c:21
  #10 make_fcontext () from /usr/lib64/libabt.so.1
  #11 ?? ()

The ds_pool_get_version call passed a NULL map argument to
pool_map_get_version. The ds_pool.sp_map field may be NULL after the
pool is started but before the pool receives the initial pool map from
the pool service. This patch fixes ds_pool_get_version to return 0,
which is less than all valid pool map versions, when sp_map is NULL,
resulting in rebuild retries like this:

  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [failed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2 status=DER_BUSY(-1012): 'Device
    or resource busy')
  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [failed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2 status=DER_BUSY(-1012): 'Device
    or resource busy')
  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [scanning] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0, [...]
  Rebuild [scanning] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0, [...]
  Rebuild [completed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0,[...]
  Target[2] (rank 2 idx 0 status 16 ver 1) is excluded.

Also, this patch removes some rebuild code that handles NULL
ds_pool.sp_group fields. Those can not happen as we always initialize
sp_group (as well as sp_iv_ns) before putting a ds_pool object into the
LRU.

Signed-off-by: Li Wei <wei.g.li@intel.com>
shimizukko pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2022
Makito and Samir observed the following assertion failure after
restarting engines.

  #0  raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #1  abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #2  __assert_fail_base () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #3  __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #4  pool_map_get_version (map=0x0) at src/common/pool_map.c:2852
  #5  ds_pool_get_version (pool=0x7f0ca063c690, pool=0x7f0ca063c690) at
      src/include/daos_srv/pool.h:296
  #6  pc=rpc@entry=0x7f0ca0998d30, p_rpt=p_rpt@entry=0x7f0ca83a77b0) at
      src/rebuild/srv.c:2101
  #7  rebuild_tgt_scan_handler (rpc=0x7f0ca0998d30) at
      src/rebuild/scan.c:954
  #8  crt_handle_rpc (arg=0x7f0ca0998d30) at src/cart/crt_rpc.c:1654
  #9  ABTD_ythread_func_wrapper (p_arg=0x7f0ca83a78a0) at
      arch/abtd_ythread.c:21
  #10 make_fcontext () from /usr/lib64/libabt.so.1
  #11 ?? ()

The ds_pool_get_version call passed a NULL map argument to
pool_map_get_version. The ds_pool.sp_map field may be NULL after the
pool is started but before the pool receives the initial pool map from
the pool service. This patch fixes ds_pool_get_version to return 0,
which is less than all valid pool map versions, when sp_map is NULL,
resulting in rebuild retries like this:

  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [failed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2 status=DER_BUSY(-1012): 'Device
    or resource busy')
  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [failed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2 status=DER_BUSY(-1012): 'Device
    or resource busy')
  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [scanning] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0, [...]
  Rebuild [scanning] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0, [...]
  Rebuild [completed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0,[...]
  Target[2] (rank 2 idx 0 status 16 ver 1) is excluded.

Also, this patch removes some rebuild code that handles NULL
ds_pool.sp_group fields. Those can not happen as we always initialize
sp_group (as well as sp_iv_ns) before putting a ds_pool object into the
LRU.

Skip-test: true
Signed-off-by: Li Wei <wei.g.li@intel.com>
liw added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2022
Makito and Samir observed the following assertion failure after
restarting engines.

  #0  raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #1  abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #2  __assert_fail_base () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #3  __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #4  pool_map_get_version (map=0x0) at src/common/pool_map.c:2852
  #5  ds_pool_get_version (pool=0x7f0ca063c690, pool=0x7f0ca063c690) at
      src/include/daos_srv/pool.h:296
  #6  pc=rpc@entry=0x7f0ca0998d30, p_rpt=p_rpt@entry=0x7f0ca83a77b0) at
      src/rebuild/srv.c:2101
  #7  rebuild_tgt_scan_handler (rpc=0x7f0ca0998d30) at
      src/rebuild/scan.c:954
  #8  crt_handle_rpc (arg=0x7f0ca0998d30) at src/cart/crt_rpc.c:1654
  #9  ABTD_ythread_func_wrapper (p_arg=0x7f0ca83a78a0) at
      arch/abtd_ythread.c:21
  #10 make_fcontext () from /usr/lib64/libabt.so.1
  #11 ?? ()

The ds_pool_get_version call passed a NULL map argument to
pool_map_get_version. The ds_pool.sp_map field may be NULL after the
pool is started but before the pool receives the initial pool map from
the pool service. This patch fixes ds_pool_get_version to return 0,
which is less than all valid pool map versions, when sp_map is NULL,
resulting in rebuild retries like this:

  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [failed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2 status=DER_BUSY(-1012): 'Device
    or resource busy')
  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [failed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2 status=DER_BUSY(-1012): 'Device
    or resource busy')
  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [scanning] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0, [...]
  Rebuild [scanning] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0, [...]
  Rebuild [completed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0,[...]
  Target[2] (rank 2 idx 0 status 16 ver 1) is excluded.

Also, this patch removes some rebuild code that handles NULL
ds_pool.sp_group fields. Those can not happen as we always initialize
sp_group (as well as sp_iv_ns) before putting a ds_pool object into the
LRU.

Signed-off-by: Li Wei <wei.g.li@intel.com>
jolivier23 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2022
Makito and Samir observed the following assertion failure after
restarting engines.

  #0  raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #1  abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #2  __assert_fail_base () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #3  __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #4  pool_map_get_version (map=0x0) at src/common/pool_map.c:2852
  #5  ds_pool_get_version (pool=0x7f0ca063c690, pool=0x7f0ca063c690) at
      src/include/daos_srv/pool.h:296
  #6  pc=rpc@entry=0x7f0ca0998d30, p_rpt=p_rpt@entry=0x7f0ca83a77b0) at
      src/rebuild/srv.c:2101
  #7  rebuild_tgt_scan_handler (rpc=0x7f0ca0998d30) at
      src/rebuild/scan.c:954
  #8  crt_handle_rpc (arg=0x7f0ca0998d30) at src/cart/crt_rpc.c:1654
  #9  ABTD_ythread_func_wrapper (p_arg=0x7f0ca83a78a0) at
      arch/abtd_ythread.c:21
  #10 make_fcontext () from /usr/lib64/libabt.so.1
  #11 ?? ()

The ds_pool_get_version call passed a NULL map argument to
pool_map_get_version. The ds_pool.sp_map field may be NULL after the
pool is started but before the pool receives the initial pool map from
the pool service. This patch fixes ds_pool_get_version to return 0,
which is less than all valid pool map versions, when sp_map is NULL,
resulting in rebuild retries like this:

  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [failed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2 status=DER_BUSY(-1012): 'Device
    or resource busy')
  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [failed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2 status=DER_BUSY(-1012): 'Device
    or resource busy')
  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [scanning] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0, [...]
  Rebuild [scanning] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0, [...]
  Rebuild [completed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0,[...]
  Target[2] (rank 2 idx 0 status 16 ver 1) is excluded.

Also, this patch removes some rebuild code that handles NULL
ds_pool.sp_group fields. Those can not happen as we always initialize
sp_group (as well as sp_iv_ns) before putting a ds_pool object into the
LRU.

Signed-off-by: Li Wei <wei.g.li@intel.com>
liw added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2022
Makito and Samir observed the following assertion failure after
restarting engines.

  #0  raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #1  abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #2  __assert_fail_base () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #3  __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #4  pool_map_get_version (map=0x0) at src/common/pool_map.c:2852
  #5  ds_pool_get_version (pool=0x7f0ca063c690, pool=0x7f0ca063c690) at
      src/include/daos_srv/pool.h:296
  #6  pc=rpc@entry=0x7f0ca0998d30, p_rpt=p_rpt@entry=0x7f0ca83a77b0) at
      src/rebuild/srv.c:2101
  #7  rebuild_tgt_scan_handler (rpc=0x7f0ca0998d30) at
      src/rebuild/scan.c:954
  #8  crt_handle_rpc (arg=0x7f0ca0998d30) at src/cart/crt_rpc.c:1654
  #9  ABTD_ythread_func_wrapper (p_arg=0x7f0ca83a78a0) at
      arch/abtd_ythread.c:21
  #10 make_fcontext () from /usr/lib64/libabt.so.1
  #11 ?? ()

The ds_pool_get_version call passed a NULL map argument to
pool_map_get_version. The ds_pool.sp_map field may be NULL after the
pool is started but before the pool receives the initial pool map from
the pool service. This patch fixes ds_pool_get_version to return 0,
which is less than all valid pool map versions, when sp_map is NULL,
resulting in rebuild retries like this:

  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [failed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2 status=DER_BUSY(-1012): 'Device
    or resource busy')
  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [failed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2 status=DER_BUSY(-1012): 'Device
    or resource busy')
  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [scanning] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0, [...]
  Rebuild [scanning] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0, [...]
  Rebuild [completed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0,[...]
  Target[2] (rank 2 idx 0 status 16 ver 1) is excluded.

Also, this patch removes some rebuild code that handles NULL
ds_pool.sp_group fields. Those can not happen as we always initialize
sp_group (as well as sp_iv_ns) before putting a ds_pool object into the
LRU.

Signed-off-by: Li Wei <wei.g.li@intel.com>
jolivier23 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2022
Makito and Samir observed the following assertion failure after
restarting engines.

  #0  raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #1  abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #2  __assert_fail_base () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #3  __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
  #4  pool_map_get_version (map=0x0) at src/common/pool_map.c:2852
  #5  ds_pool_get_version (pool=0x7f0ca063c690, pool=0x7f0ca063c690) at
      src/include/daos_srv/pool.h:296
  #6  pc=rpc@entry=0x7f0ca0998d30, p_rpt=p_rpt@entry=0x7f0ca83a77b0) at
      src/rebuild/srv.c:2101
  #7  rebuild_tgt_scan_handler (rpc=0x7f0ca0998d30) at
      src/rebuild/scan.c:954
  #8  crt_handle_rpc (arg=0x7f0ca0998d30) at src/cart/crt_rpc.c:1654
  #9  ABTD_ythread_func_wrapper (p_arg=0x7f0ca83a78a0) at
      arch/abtd_ythread.c:21
  #10 make_fcontext () from /usr/lib64/libabt.so.1
  #11 ?? ()

The ds_pool_get_version call passed a NULL map argument to
pool_map_get_version. The ds_pool.sp_map field may be NULL after the
pool is started but before the pool receives the initial pool map from
the pool service. This patch fixes ds_pool_get_version to return 0,
which is less than all valid pool map versions, when sp_map is NULL,
resulting in rebuild retries like this:

  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [failed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2 status=DER_BUSY(-1012): 'Device
    or resource busy')
  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [failed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2 status=DER_BUSY(-1012): 'Device
    or resource busy')
  Rebuild [queued] (pool=3bf68c9c ver=2) tgts=2
  Rebuild [started] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2)
  Rebuild [scanning] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0, [...]
  Rebuild [scanning] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0, [...]
  Rebuild [completed] (pool 3bf68c9c ver=2, toberb_obj=0, rb_obj=0,[...]
  Target[2] (rank 2 idx 0 status 16 ver 1) is excluded.

Also, this patch removes some rebuild code that handles NULL
ds_pool.sp_group fields. Those can not happen as we always initialize
sp_group (as well as sp_iv_ns) before putting a ds_pool object into the
LRU.

Signed-off-by: Li Wei <wei.g.li@intel.com>
mlawsonca pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2023
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Sitkiewicz <lukasz.sitkiewicz@intel.com>
osalyk pushed a commit to osalyk/daos that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
…caffolding

dumps: dtx_update_abort scaffolding
liw added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2026
Looks like ds_pool.sp_recov_lock is not initialized via
ABT_rwlock_create. This led to the following ABT error,

  #5  in ds_cont_tgt_open at src/container/srv_target.c:1954
  #6  in cont_iv_ent_update at src/container/container_iv.c:646
  #7  in update_iv_value at src/engine/server_iv.c:280
  #8  in iv_on_update_internal at src/engine/server_iv.c:490
  #9  in ivc_on_update at src/engine/server_iv.c:530
  #10 in crt_iv_update_internal at src/cart/crt_iv.c:3438
  #11 in crt_iv_update at src/cart/crt_iv.c:3559
  #12 in iv_op_internal at src/engine/server_iv.c:1080
  #13 in _iv_op at src/engine/server_iv.c:1129
  #14 in iv_op at src/engine/server_iv.c:1241
  #15 in ds_iv_update at src/engine/server_iv.c:1287
  #16 in cont_iv_update at src/container/container_iv.c:867
  #17 in cont_iv_capability_update at src/container/container_iv.c:1245
  #18 in cont_open at src/container/srv_container.c:2821
  #19 in cont_op_with_cont at src/container/srv_container.c:5613
  #20 in cont_op_with_svc at src/container/srv_container.c:5845
  #21 in ds_cont_op_handler at src/container/srv_container.c:6064
  #22 in ds_cont_op_handler_v8 at src/container/srv_container.c:6108
  #23 in crt_handle_rpc at src/cart/crt_rpc.c:1747

where the line was

  #5  in ds_cont_tgt_open at src/container/srv_target.c:1954
  1954            DABT_RWLOCK_RDLOCK(pool->sp_recov_lock);

Signed-off-by: Li Wei <liwei@hpe.com>
liw added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2026
Looks like ds_pool.sp_recov_lock is not initialized via
ABT_rwlock_create. This led to the following ABT error,

  #5  in ds_cont_tgt_open at src/container/srv_target.c:1954
  #6  in cont_iv_ent_update at src/container/container_iv.c:646
  #7  in update_iv_value at src/engine/server_iv.c:280
  #8  in iv_on_update_internal at src/engine/server_iv.c:490
  #9  in ivc_on_update at src/engine/server_iv.c:530
  #10 in crt_iv_update_internal at src/cart/crt_iv.c:3438
  #11 in crt_iv_update at src/cart/crt_iv.c:3559
  #12 in iv_op_internal at src/engine/server_iv.c:1080
  #13 in _iv_op at src/engine/server_iv.c:1129
  #14 in iv_op at src/engine/server_iv.c:1241
  #15 in ds_iv_update at src/engine/server_iv.c:1287
  #16 in cont_iv_update at src/container/container_iv.c:867
  #17 in cont_iv_capability_update at src/container/container_iv.c:1245
  #18 in cont_open at src/container/srv_container.c:2821
  #19 in cont_op_with_cont at src/container/srv_container.c:5613
  #20 in cont_op_with_svc at src/container/srv_container.c:5845
  #21 in ds_cont_op_handler at src/container/srv_container.c:6064
  #22 in ds_cont_op_handler_v8 at src/container/srv_container.c:6108
  #23 in crt_handle_rpc at src/cart/crt_rpc.c:1747

where the line was

  #5  in ds_cont_tgt_open at src/container/srv_target.c:1954
  1954            DABT_RWLOCK_RDLOCK(pool->sp_recov_lock);

Signed-off-by: Li Wei <liwei@hpe.com>
gnailzenh pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2026
Looks like ds_pool.sp_recov_lock is not initialized via
ABT_rwlock_create. This led to the following ABT error,

  #5  in ds_cont_tgt_open at src/container/srv_target.c:1954
  #6  in cont_iv_ent_update at src/container/container_iv.c:646
  #7  in update_iv_value at src/engine/server_iv.c:280
  #8  in iv_on_update_internal at src/engine/server_iv.c:490
  #9  in ivc_on_update at src/engine/server_iv.c:530
  #10 in crt_iv_update_internal at src/cart/crt_iv.c:3438
  #11 in crt_iv_update at src/cart/crt_iv.c:3559
  #12 in iv_op_internal at src/engine/server_iv.c:1080
  #13 in _iv_op at src/engine/server_iv.c:1129
  #14 in iv_op at src/engine/server_iv.c:1241
  #15 in ds_iv_update at src/engine/server_iv.c:1287
  #16 in cont_iv_update at src/container/container_iv.c:867
  #17 in cont_iv_capability_update at src/container/container_iv.c:1245
  #18 in cont_open at src/container/srv_container.c:2821
  #19 in cont_op_with_cont at src/container/srv_container.c:5613
  #20 in cont_op_with_svc at src/container/srv_container.c:5845
  #21 in ds_cont_op_handler at src/container/srv_container.c:6064
  #22 in ds_cont_op_handler_v8 at src/container/srv_container.c:6108
  #23 in crt_handle_rpc at src/cart/crt_rpc.c:1747

where the line was

  #5  in ds_cont_tgt_open at src/container/srv_target.c:1954
  1954            DABT_RWLOCK_RDLOCK(pool->sp_recov_lock);

Signed-off-by: Li Wei <liwei@hpe.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants