Repository navigation
Phylsbranch - #20
Closed
phylcrandall wants to merge 0 commit into
Closed
Phylsbranch#20phylcrandall wants to merge 0 commit into
phylcrandall wants to merge 0 commit into
Conversation
Collaborator
|
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
brianjmurrell
force-pushed
the
pipeline-pr-test
branch
2 times, most recently
from
September 7, 2018 02:21
bc5b47a to
43bdaeb
Compare
phylcrandall
force-pushed
the
phylsbranch
branch
from
September 10, 2018 17:06
fba59c4 to
e4104bc
Compare
jolivier23
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2020
…mmon in test code. (#20) Signed-off-by: Scott Kirvan <scott.kirvan@intel.com>
jolivier23
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 14, 2020
mlawsonca
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2023
Removed server and client config .yaml files from the images directory. Config files are no longer added in the images and expected to be modified when the instances start. Config files are now templates in terraform. The templates are rendered and added to metadata values for each instance. Then a startup script is used to get the content of the metadata values and save it to the config doas_*.yml files. This allows settings such as nr_hugepages, targets, scm_size in the config files to be set properly based on the terraform variables. The daos_server terraform module now has an output value named access_points that contains a list of the access points needed for the daos_agent.yml and daos_control.yml on the clients. Signed-off-by: Mark A. Olson <mark.a.olson@intel.com>
osalyk
pushed a commit
to osalyk/daos
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2023
dumps: refine dtx_update_abort/vos_obj_hold
liw
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
Looks like ds_pool.sp_recov_lock is not initialized via ABT_rwlock_create. This led to the following ABT error, #5 in ds_cont_tgt_open at src/container/srv_target.c:1954 #6 in cont_iv_ent_update at src/container/container_iv.c:646 #7 in update_iv_value at src/engine/server_iv.c:280 #8 in iv_on_update_internal at src/engine/server_iv.c:490 #9 in ivc_on_update at src/engine/server_iv.c:530 #10 in crt_iv_update_internal at src/cart/crt_iv.c:3438 #11 in crt_iv_update at src/cart/crt_iv.c:3559 #12 in iv_op_internal at src/engine/server_iv.c:1080 #13 in _iv_op at src/engine/server_iv.c:1129 #14 in iv_op at src/engine/server_iv.c:1241 #15 in ds_iv_update at src/engine/server_iv.c:1287 #16 in cont_iv_update at src/container/container_iv.c:867 #17 in cont_iv_capability_update at src/container/container_iv.c:1245 #18 in cont_open at src/container/srv_container.c:2821 #19 in cont_op_with_cont at src/container/srv_container.c:5613 #20 in cont_op_with_svc at src/container/srv_container.c:5845 #21 in ds_cont_op_handler at src/container/srv_container.c:6064 #22 in ds_cont_op_handler_v8 at src/container/srv_container.c:6108 #23 in crt_handle_rpc at src/cart/crt_rpc.c:1747 where the line was #5 in ds_cont_tgt_open at src/container/srv_target.c:1954 1954 DABT_RWLOCK_RDLOCK(pool->sp_recov_lock); Signed-off-by: Li Wei <liwei@hpe.com>
liw
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2026
Looks like ds_pool.sp_recov_lock is not initialized via ABT_rwlock_create. This led to the following ABT error, #5 in ds_cont_tgt_open at src/container/srv_target.c:1954 #6 in cont_iv_ent_update at src/container/container_iv.c:646 #7 in update_iv_value at src/engine/server_iv.c:280 #8 in iv_on_update_internal at src/engine/server_iv.c:490 #9 in ivc_on_update at src/engine/server_iv.c:530 #10 in crt_iv_update_internal at src/cart/crt_iv.c:3438 #11 in crt_iv_update at src/cart/crt_iv.c:3559 #12 in iv_op_internal at src/engine/server_iv.c:1080 #13 in _iv_op at src/engine/server_iv.c:1129 #14 in iv_op at src/engine/server_iv.c:1241 #15 in ds_iv_update at src/engine/server_iv.c:1287 #16 in cont_iv_update at src/container/container_iv.c:867 #17 in cont_iv_capability_update at src/container/container_iv.c:1245 #18 in cont_open at src/container/srv_container.c:2821 #19 in cont_op_with_cont at src/container/srv_container.c:5613 #20 in cont_op_with_svc at src/container/srv_container.c:5845 #21 in ds_cont_op_handler at src/container/srv_container.c:6064 #22 in ds_cont_op_handler_v8 at src/container/srv_container.c:6108 #23 in crt_handle_rpc at src/cart/crt_rpc.c:1747 where the line was #5 in ds_cont_tgt_open at src/container/srv_target.c:1954 1954 DABT_RWLOCK_RDLOCK(pool->sp_recov_lock); Signed-off-by: Li Wei <liwei@hpe.com>
gnailzenh
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2026
Looks like ds_pool.sp_recov_lock is not initialized via ABT_rwlock_create. This led to the following ABT error, #5 in ds_cont_tgt_open at src/container/srv_target.c:1954 #6 in cont_iv_ent_update at src/container/container_iv.c:646 #7 in update_iv_value at src/engine/server_iv.c:280 #8 in iv_on_update_internal at src/engine/server_iv.c:490 #9 in ivc_on_update at src/engine/server_iv.c:530 #10 in crt_iv_update_internal at src/cart/crt_iv.c:3438 #11 in crt_iv_update at src/cart/crt_iv.c:3559 #12 in iv_op_internal at src/engine/server_iv.c:1080 #13 in _iv_op at src/engine/server_iv.c:1129 #14 in iv_op at src/engine/server_iv.c:1241 #15 in ds_iv_update at src/engine/server_iv.c:1287 #16 in cont_iv_update at src/container/container_iv.c:867 #17 in cont_iv_capability_update at src/container/container_iv.c:1245 #18 in cont_open at src/container/srv_container.c:2821 #19 in cont_op_with_cont at src/container/srv_container.c:5613 #20 in cont_op_with_svc at src/container/srv_container.c:5845 #21 in ds_cont_op_handler at src/container/srv_container.c:6064 #22 in ds_cont_op_handler_v8 at src/container/srv_container.c:6108 #23 in crt_handle_rpc at src/cart/crt_rpc.c:1747 where the line was #5 in ds_cont_tgt_open at src/container/srv_target.c:1954 1954 DABT_RWLOCK_RDLOCK(pool->sp_recov_lock); Signed-off-by: Li Wei <liwei@hpe.com>
dinghwah
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2026
Signed-off-by: Ding-Hwa Ho <ding-hwa.ho@hpe.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.