Repository navigation
Conversation
The turn ended with these files edited and never committed. Uncommitted work is invisible to the review - it reads the branch - so the attempt would have been released as empty and the next bee would have started beside this work rather than from it. This commit is not a claim that the work is correct. It is the bee's work, committed on its behalf, and it is judged exactly like any other: the adversarial reviewer reads it, the compiler runs on it, and the issue's own criteria are measured against it. Issue: #5091 Turn: efb07899-3cba-48ba-b075-567aa1cf036c Ending: finished (the turn closed) Committed: 1 path(s) Left uncommitted: 1 path(s) outside the declared boundary
The turn ended with these files edited and never committed. Uncommitted work is invisible to the review - it reads the branch - so the attempt would have been released as empty and the next bee would have started beside this work rather than from it. This commit is not a claim that the work is correct. It is the bee's work, committed on its behalf, and it is judged exactly like any other: the adversarial reviewer reads it, the compiler runs on it, and the issue's own criteria are measured against it. Issue: #5091 Turn: 74414b78-3319-442a-b261-eaac4c45110c Ending: finished (the turn closed) Committed: 1 path(s) Left uncommitted: 1 path(s) outside the declared boundary
…eights_jtag.t27 Closes #5091
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #5091 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
![t27-bees[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6774813?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head 473c0283e7839e928abcc3ad95c2dc09fbb2cdea (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.5-flash, 6 turns, 149 s; then glm-4.7-flash, 9 turns, 547 s).
BEE-VERDICT: REQUEST_CHANGES
summary: The bee created the correct .t27 spec file with all tests passing, but added an extra docs/now/ file outside the issue's boundary.
criterion: "File exists" -- met -- evidence: brief.md:534
criterion: "Module name matches" -- met -- evidence: brief.md:535
criterion: "Generated Verilog parses" -- met -- evidence: brief.md:537
criterion: "Has at least 1 test" -- met -- evidence: brief.md:538
criterion: "Generated code compiles and tests run" -- met -- evidence: brief.md:539
blocking-check: The bee added an extra file docs/now/2026-10-06-published-port-fpga-verilog-phi-weights-jtag-v-verilog-1-module-to-spe.md outside the boundary specified in issue #5091 (brief.md:416-417; issue #5091:31)
Evidence
The first review (glm-4.7-flash) approved this head. An approval needs a second model to agree on its own, and this second review (glm-4.7-flash) did not.
Looking at the acceptance criteria and the changes:
Acceptance Criteria Verification:
- ✓ File exists - PASSED
- ✓ Module name matches - PASSED
- ✓ Generated Verilog parses - PASSED
- ✓ Has at least 1 test - PASSED (4 tests)
- ✓ Generated code compiles and tests run - PASSED (0 BLOCKED)
Critical Finding: The PR added docs/now/2026-10-06-published-port-fpga-verilog-phi-weights-jtag-v-verilog-1-module-to-spe.md, which is outside the boundary specified in issue #5091. The issue states "Only this file" meaning ONLY specs/port/fpga/verilog/phi_weights_jtag.t27. The PR description notes the second commit is a coordination entry "which a bee has no way to know about," indicating the bee did not intentionally create this file. However, the bee's instructions require reporting any file outside the boundary regardless of how it was created.
Red Check Analysis:
Check L1 TRACEABILITY- The check fails on commits6a6f23d33and88fe3fc58which are from earlier in the branch, not the HEAD commit. The HEAD commit473c0283ecorrectly references #5091. This failure predates this change.spec-guards- This compares ring-097-rust tospecs/ar/proof_trace.t27, a different spec file than the one being modified. The drift exists on master already (ring-097-rust differs from ar/proof_trace.t27 in 7 functions). This failure is pre-existing and not caused by this change.
Conclusion: The bee successfully created the .t27 spec file and all acceptance criteria are met. However, the unauthorized docs/now/ file violates the boundary constraint. The bee should remove this file.
…oad spends no attempt (Refs #5776) B34. The two-model rule dead-ended: when z.ai answered 1305 and the CLI fell back mid-review, the first review's modelUsage held both free flash models and second_model() found none left, so every such APPROVE ended incomplete -- 29 rows in all, 18 of the 23 incompletes on 2026-10-06. The CLI (2.1.283) does not alternate: on 1305 it sets mainLoopModel to the fallback and stays there, so the verdict was written by glm-4.5-flash. The rule is kept -- two models, each reaching APPROVE on its own from the same brief -- and the second model now only has to differ from the model that WROTE the first verdict (verdict_model). It still runs without a fallback. An agent-failed on 1305 (the second opinion has no fallback) is z.ai's load, not the head's, and spends no attempt, as B18 made a fallback free: #6551 and #6730 are reviewable again. The opinion now names the model that wrote it, so a review that ran wholly on 4.5 no longer reads "glm-4.7-flash approved, glm-4.7-flash requested changes" (#6759). Six new self-test checks failed by name on the old code; self-test 0 failures, bees 0, merger gate 0 of 26, loop-tools 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This branch has not been deployed
2 participants
Closes #5091
Written by a bee on
queen-5091and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code