Repository navigation
t27b checked: test blocks for 7 tri cards (1 of 5) - #6607
Conversation
![t27-bees[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6774813?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head 4d7ad7f56c6feeab17ce13c1338c4be0b971e372 (tools/bees/reviewer.py, zai glm-4.7-flash, 7 turns, 98 s; then glm-4.5-flash, 3 turns, 48 s).
BEE-VERDICT: APPROVE
summary: All 7 boundary specs now have one test block each with 4 valid assertions; no lines changed or removed; all 14 runner criteria passed
criterion: FR-001 -- met -- all 7 files got exactly one test block appended, no other lines changed (diff: 7 files, 49 insertions)
criterion: FR-002 -- met -- each test block has 4 asserts comparing declared constants to literals (e.g., bench.t27:11-14)
criterion: FR-003 -- met -- all 14 runner criteria passed (brief:lines 325-338)
criterion: FR-004 -- met -- no new non-ASCII characters added (all asserts use ASCII identifiers and literals)
criterion: FR-005 -- met -- only 7 .t27 files modified (diff shows 7 files changed)
criterion: FR-006 -- met -- PR body includes t27b-blog line with +7 specs
discounted-check: Corpus ratchet (expected-failure ledger) -- same failure on master (282f701) due to new GateScarab entry, not introduced by this PR
discounted-check: coverage -- same failure on master (282f701) with 9 stale seals in files NOT touched by this PR
discounted-check: duplicate-bodies -- same failure on master (282f701) about duplicate put bodies, pre-existing system state issue
discounted-check: fix-carries-source -- CANCELLED on this head, no failure (master succeeded)
discounted-check: spec-guards -- same failure on master (282f701) with 28 known stale entries in files NOT touched by this PR
discounted-check: untrusted-input -- CANCELLED on this head, no failure (master succeeded)
Evidence
Based on my analysis:
1. Criteria Evaluation
All acceptance criteria from issue #6484 are met:
-
FR-001: Each of the 7 boundary files (
bench.t27,bio.t27,blindspots.t27,conscious.t27,constants.t27,cosmos.t27,dashboard.t27) has exactly one test block appended. No existing lines were changed, reordered, or removed. (diff: 7 files, 49 insertions, all additions at end of files) -
FR-002: Each test block has exactly 4 asserts comparing constants to their literal values:
assert KIND == "tool"assert FAMILY == "tri-cli"assert SCHEMA == 2- Plus one of:
NAMESPACE,ROUTED, orCATEGORY(verified in the source files)
-
FR-003: All runner criteria passed (14/14):
t27c test-reportprints2(tests 1/pass 1/FAIL 0) for each of the 7 specs- Each file has at least 4 asserts
- All assertions hold true
-
FR-004: All files remain ASCII-only. No non-ASCII characters added (the existing files have Unicode comments, but no new non-ASCII content was introduced)
-
FR-005: PR contains only the 7 boundary
.t27files (the PR body mentions "changes no existing line") -
FR-006: PR body includes
t27b-blog: +7 specs/tools/trinity/tri/{bench,bio,blindspots,conscious,constants,cosmos,dashboard}.t27
No edits outside the named files, no deleted tests, no weakened assertions, no non-ASCII identifiers added, no secrets introduced.
2. Red Checks Analysis
The 6 red checks do not count against this head:
-
Corpus ratchet (expected-failure ledger): On master (commit 282f701), this check also failed with the same error. The failure is due to a NEW conflict type name (GateScarab) being added to the ledger. This is an external system state issue, not a defect introduced by this PR. -
duplicate-bodies: On master (commit 282f701), this check also failed with the same error about "a body written under put is now copied [2] time(s)". This is a pre-existing system state issue. -
coverage: On master (commit 282f701), this check also failed with the same 9 stale seal entries. These failures are in files NOT modified by this PR (e.g., sorting specs, fpga verification, ml specs). The PR author documented these in the brief as "known stale" and the author is re-blessing the ledger. -
spec-guards: On master (commit 282f701), this check also failed with the same 28 known stale entries. Again, these are in files not touched by this PR. The author documented these as "known stale (each needs its spec fixed)". -
fix-carries-source: CANCELLED on this head (no steps recorded), on master it succeeded. No failure occurred on this head. -
untrusted-input: CANCELLED on this head (no steps recorded), on master it succeeded. No failure occurred on this head.
The red checks represent pre-existing system state issues (ledger entries, stale seals, and duplicate bodies) that are documented and expected. This PR itself is sound and does not introduce any real defects.
Second, independent review (glm-4.5-flash): APPROVE -- PR successfully adds test blocks to 7 trinity specs, converting them from pass_vacuous to checked passes
t27-bees
Bot
added
the
bee-reviewed
PR DashboardGenerated at: 2026-10-05 23:01:20 UTC
Summary
Seal Status
|
1 participant
Closes #6484
Refs #6063. Reviewed by hand (review-jam lane A). The bee branch appends one
testblock to each of the 7 cards in the boundary and changes no existing line. Each block holds 4 asserts that compare a declared constant with its literal value (KIND, FAMILY, SCHEMA, NAMESPACE), noassert true. Measured on the Railway t27c lab (t27c at /data/target/release/t27c, zig 0.16.0):t27c test-reportprintstests 1 / pass 1 / FAIL 0for all 7 specs;spec-statusNOFN (cards declare no functions), gen has 0not yet implemented. The cards still load in tools/trinity_tools_registry.py (it reads onlypub constlines).t27b-blog: +7 specs/tools/trinity/tri/{bench,bio,blindspots,conscious,constants,cosmos,dashboard}.t27
🤖 Generated with Claude Code