Repository navigation
Port gHashTag/trinity:fpga/openxc7-synth/d_y0_test.v (Verilog, 1 module) to specs/port/trinity/fpga/openxc7-synth/d_y0_t - #5756
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…tion Create specs/port/trinity/fpga/openxc7-synth/d_y0_test.t27 as module trinity_top that implements the 24-bit counter with BUFG clock buffer and MSB LED output. The port includes: - Clock buffer configuration and validation - 24-bit counter with wrap-around behavior - MSB extraction for LED output - Comprehensive tests covering counter behavior, edge cases, and validation - Benchmarks for performance validation Closes #5749
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #5749 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
Contributor
|
📓 NotebookLM Notebook linked to this PR
This notebook contains session context, decisions, and artifacts for this work. |
![t27-bees[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/6774813?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewer bee verdict for head 91ed205c20eeb7eeb84eb260db744a547767eff1 (tools/bees/reviewer.py, model opus, 6 turns, 41 s).
BEE-VERDICT: REQUEST_CHANGES
summary: The .t27 port follows the cts.t27 shape, but the added docs/now entry's first line fails check_now_entry_shape, and gen-verilog/spec-status/test-report results are not verified.
criterion: "test -f ... prints present" -- met -- diff adds specs/port/trinity/fpga/openxc7-synth/d_y0_test.t27 (new file mode 100644)
criterion: "grep module trinity_top prints 1" -- met -- d_y0_test.t27 line 9 module trinity_top { (only occurrence)
criterion: "gen-verilog ... module trinity_top ( prints 1" -- unmet -- not verified: t27c not runnable here, no CI log in brief shows gen-verilog output
criterion: "spec-status does not print NOPARSE" -- unmet -- not verified directly; parse-ratchet green and syntax mirrors specs/fpga/cts.t27:140-166, but no spec-status output in brief
criterion: "grep test blocks prints at least 1" -- met -- d_y0_test.t27 has 17 test <name> lines (diff lines 163-253)
criterion: "test-report ... grep -c BLOCKED prints 0" -- unmet -- not verified; &str fields, .field = struct literals and 1 << bit_pos with u32 shift may not compile to Zig, and no test-report output in brief
discounted-check: spec-guards -- red on master 622352d at the same step "Does every ring still agree with the spec it names" with the same ring-088..101 drift report; this PR touches none of those specs
discounted-check: untrusted-input -- fails only on "1157 appears nowhere -- the re-takes quote a corpus that has moved", a corpus count that any added spec moves; the change does not touch the re-take blocks
blocking-check: check -- the head adds docs/now/2026-10-03-published-port-...-verilog.md whose first line ends (published 2026-10-03), which does not match HEADING \((\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2})\) at tools/check_now_entry_shape.py:57
Evidence
PR #5756 needs changes. The .t27 port looks reasonable, but the check failure comes from a file this head adds. Separately, I couldn't confirm criteria 3, 4 and 6, because they need t27c and I only have read-only tools.
Scope
- The diff adds two files. One is the boundary file,
specs/port/trinity/fpga/openxc7-synth/d_y0_test.t27. - The other is
docs/now/2026-10-03-published-port-…-verilog.md. The publisher wrote it, and the PR body says every pull request must add one. - Nothing under
gen/changes, no tests are deleted, no other spec is edited, and I found no secrets and no non-ASCII identifiers.
The port (d_y0_test.t27)
module trinity_top {is at diff line 32, so the module keeps the original's name.- It follows the
given/thenstyle thatspecs/fpga/cts.t27:140-166uses, which the issue names as the reference. - It models what the original does:
- the BUFG as a passthrough (
buffer_clock) - a 24-bit counter that wraps (
next_counter_value,max_value = 16777215) led = counter[23](counter_msb, with1 << 23)
- the BUFG as a passthrough (
- The tests check values the original would produce: 16777215 wraps to 0, and bit 23 is set for 8388608 but not for 8388607.
- Some parts are filler:
- Invariant
msb_is_boolean(x == true or x == false) can never fail, so it checks nothing (FR-004). validate_*,is_counter_power_of_twoand the bench blocks aren't in the original.- The file has no newline at the end.
- Invariant
- Things that might stop the generated Zig from compiling:
&strfields,.field =struct literals, and1 << bit_poswherebit_posis au32(Zig wants a smaller shift type). Runningt27c gen-verilog/test-reportwould settle this.
Red checks
check: counts against this head.tools/check_now_entry_shape.py:57requires the first line to match^# NOW -- (.+) \((\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2})\)\s*$. The added entry ends with(published 2026-10-03), and the wordpublishedinside the brackets breaks the match. This file is new in this head, and the check doesn't run on master, so nothing there to compare against. The fix is to end the first line with(2026-10-03).spec-guards: does not count. Master 622352d fails the same step for the same ring/spec reasons (ring-096 has DRIFTED, ring-090 is CONVERGED, etc.). None of those specs are touched by this PR.untrusted-input: does not count. It fails because "1157 appears nowhere": the number of specs walked changed. Any added spec moves that count, so it isn't a defect in this PR.
This was referenced Oct 3, 2026
Merged
tools/queen/publish.py wrote `(published DATE)`, which tools/check_now_entry_shape.py HEADING does not accept; fixed in the publisher by #5777. Only the first line changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
PR DashboardGenerated at: 2026-10-03 17:40:16 UTC
Summary
Seal Status
|
Contributor
|
📓 NotebookLM Notebook linked to this PR
This notebook contains session context, decisions, and artifacts for this work. |
This was referenced Oct 3, 2026
Open
This was referenced Oct 4, 2026
Merged
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #5749
Written by a bee on
queen-5749and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code