[DSD-9381]transfer images from mosipdev2 to mosipqa

[bhumi46]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated container image namespace references in deployment configuration
  • Standardized version formatting for image entries

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the image registry configuration file by migrating container image references from the mosipdev namespace to mosipdev2 and normalizing version tag formatting by removing the "release-" prefix from version entries (e.g., release-1.3.x to 1.3.x).

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Image namespace and version updates release/vidivi/images.txt	Migrates container image references from mosipdev to mosipdev2 namespace; normalizes version column formatting by removing "release-" prefix from version tags across all image entries

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

• Single configuration file with repetitive, consistent formatting changes applied uniformly across entries
• No functional logic, new features, or complex interactions to assess
• Straightforward namespace and version tag normalization

Possibly related PRs

• [DSD-9378] mosipdev2 to mosipqa #1427: Performs identical mosipdev → mosipdev2 namespace migration and version tag normalization (removing "release-" prefix) in the same file
• [DSD-9355] Image transfer from dev2 to qa . #1420: Applies the same container image host rename from mosipdev to mosipdev2 with matching second-column version token collapsing pattern
• [DSD-9235] Image transfer from dev2 to qa. #1388: Modifies the same image entries by changing namespaces from mosipdev to mosipdev2 and simplifying version tag format

Suggested reviewers

• ckm007

Poem

🐰 A rabbit hops through image streams,
From mosipdev to mosipdev2's gleams,
Strip the "release-" prefix with care,
Namespace migration everywhere,
Registry hopping through the air! 🎉

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	The title claims to transfer images from mosipdev2 to mosipqa, but the changes show images being transferred from mosipdev to mosipdev2 namespace, which is the opposite direction.	Update the title to accurately reflect the actual changes: 'DSD-9381 transfer images from mosipdev to mosipdev2' or verify the changes match the intended direction.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f606567 and af52743.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• release/vidivi/images.txt (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

release/vidivi/images.txt (1)

1-55: Clarify registry namespace target — PR title and implementation appear misaligned.

The PR title indicates "transfer images from mosipdev2 to mosipqa", but all 55 lines reference the mosipdev2 namespace. Verify which is correct:

1. Should the namespace be mosipqa (per PR title), or should the PR title be updated to reflect mosipdev2?
2. Confirm the version format change (e.g., release-1.3.x → 1.3.x) is compatible with your deployment pipeline.
3. Verify that line 8's use of release-0.1.x 0.1.x (distinct from the 1.3.x pattern) is intentional.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}