Repository navigation
Additoinal losses - #336
Conversation
awni
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the contribution!!
We already have a hinge and huber loss already. The focal, dice, and contrastive are in #324. Please remove all of them and rebase to resolve conflicts.
If you want to add the cosine loss in this PR that would be great.
add cos sim
cos sim test
awni
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! I left a couple comments, please address then let me know when ready for re-review.
|
|
||
| if __name__ == "__main__": | ||
| unittest.main() | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: can you remove that extra line
|
Hey @Jyun1998 sorry but somehow my main comment did not get included. I must have not pushed the save button by accident. Basically I'm wondering what reference you use for this loss as it looks quite different than the similarly named cosine similarity loss in PyTorch ? For example there is a |
|
@Jyun1998 are you still planning to follow up on this? |
https://github.com/keras-team/keras/blob/v2.14.0/keras/losses.py#L1162-L1236 Hi awni, according to common tensorflow and pytorch implementaiton, the functions are composed of doing l2 norm to each embedding and returns the negative of dot product of both embedding. My codes also do so, and margin-based loss is applying if it's necessary :) |
|
@Jyun1998 got it. We should keep it simple until we see that we need more features. Could you follow the PyTorch cosine similarity loss? I think that one covers the most common case (margin / targets are are niche and possibly never needed so we don't want to add them to the API until we are sure they are necessary) |
I also agree. Even though there's also margin for pytorch F.cosine_similarity, it defaultly do not use it. There's only slight change needed for changes and I will test the function and commit asap. Thanks for the review |
|
I see, thanks. Yes let's go with the plain cosine similarity for now. Thank you! |
|
Also could you rebase and resolve conflicts? |
Am I correct that losses test codes are gone? nvm found new losses test file |
* fix: tidy pull request template * fix: feedback from awni
* Added scale for RoPE * Ran pre-commit * Added RoPE scaling test * Added docstring for scale parameter * Modified docstrings
* feat: Add Dropout3d layer to nn.layers * acknowledgement * Add dropout tests to test_nn.py * run pre-commit * Add activation functions and dropout3d ops * Add dropout tests for bfloat16 and float16
Co-authored-by: xuan <xuan@apple.com>
Co-authored-by: Chunyang Wen <chunyang_wen@apple.com>
* spelling: accumulates Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: across Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: additional Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: against Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: among Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: array Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: at least Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: available Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: axes Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: basically Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: bfloat Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: bounds Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: broadcast Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: buffer Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: class Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: coefficients Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: collision Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: combinations Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: committing Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: computation Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: consider Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: constructing Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: conversions Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: correctly Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: corresponding Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: declaration Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: default Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: dependency Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: destination Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: destructor Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: dimensions Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: divided Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: element-wise Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: elements Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: endianness Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: equivalent Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: explicitly Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: github Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: indices Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: irregularly Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: memory Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: metallib Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: negative Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: notable Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: optional Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: otherwise Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: overridden Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: partially Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: partition Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: perform Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: perturbations Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: positively Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: primitive Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: repeat Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: repeats Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: respect Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: respectively Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: result Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: rounding Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: separate Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: skipping Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: structure Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: the Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: transpose Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: unnecessary Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: unneeded Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> * spelling: unsupported Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
add cos sim
cos sim test
Could you check? Thanks :) |
awni
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks great, thanks for the contribution @Jyun1998 !
feat: `ARRAY_API_TESTS_MODULE` for runtime-defined xp


Proposed changes
Added commonly used losses with tests
Checklist
Put an
xin the boxes that apply.pre-commit run --all-filesto format my code / installed pre-commit prior to committing changes