Skip to content

fix(queen): ask CI only about accepted issues that are still open - #509

Merged
gHashTag merged 1 commit into
feat/queen-supervisorfrom
fix/ci-verdict-open-issues-only
Sep 22, 2026
Merged

gHashTag merged 1 commit into
feat/queen-supervisorfrom
fix/ci-verdict-open-issues-only

Conversation

@gHashTag

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

After #507 was deployed, the CI check walked every accept ever recorded: 494 rows, about 460 of them on closed issues, 8 per round. The open issue it exists for (#4385, with a red parse-ratchet on t27#4578) was an hour of rounds away. It now asks only about issues in queen_issues, the round's mirror of the open set, with the same empty-mirror fallback the review sweep uses. There's one new test; the suite is 15/15.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The first deploy of queen-ci-verdict (#507) walked every accept ever recorded:
494 rows, 460 of them on issues closed long ago, eight a round - so the open
issue it exists for (#4385, red parse-ratchet on #4578) was an hour of rounds
away. It now asks only about issues in queen_issues, the round's mirror of the
open set, with the same empty-mirror fallback the review sweep uses.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the fix label Sep 22, 2026
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Tests passed — 2394/2454

Suite Passed Failed Skipped
✅ agent 87/87 0 0
✅ build 9/9 0 0
✅ cdp-protocol 5/5 0 0
✅ eval 93/93 0 0
✅ server-agent 272/272 0 0
✅ server-api 1273/1332 0 59
✅ server-browser 6/6 0 0
✅ server-integration 10/11 0 1
✅ server-lib 279/279 0 0
✅ server-pglive 3/3 0 0
✅ server-root 68/68 0 0
✅ server-skills 31/31 0 0
✅ server-tools 244/244 0 0
✅ shared 14/14 0 0

View workflow run

@gHashTag
gHashTag merged commit 0e8940a into feat/queen-supervisor Sep 22, 2026
17 of 18 checks passed
@github-actions
github-actions Bot deleted the fix/ci-verdict-open-issues-only branch September 27, 2026 04:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant