DAOS-6063 control: event notifications from harness to MS by tanabarr · Pull Request #4032 · daos-stack/daos

tanabarr · 2020-12-07T23:15:10Z

Initial implementation of RAS event notifications between control-plane
instances and management service. Event definitions described in
daos_srv/ras.h as a central location to be accessible from control and
data planes. Rank exit event registration and processing implemented.

daosbuild1

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T17:43:21Z

Test stage checkpatch completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/4/execution/node/60/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T17:49:58Z

Test stage Build RPM on CentOS 7 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/4/execution/node/287/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T17:50:12Z

Test stage Build DEB on Ubuntu 20.04 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/4/execution/node/227/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T17:53:49Z

Test stage Build RPM on Leap 15 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/4/execution/node/300/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T18:02:58Z

Test stage Build on Ubuntu 20.04 with Clang completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/4/execution/node/304/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T18:03:36Z

Test stage Build on CentOS 7 release completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/4/execution/node/344/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T18:04:43Z

Test stage Build on CentOS 7 debug completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/4/execution/node/347/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T18:05:40Z

Test stage Build on Leap 15 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/4/execution/node/315/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T18:05:41Z

Test stage Build on CentOS 7 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/4/execution/node/349/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T18:06:19Z

Test stage Build on Leap 15 with Intel-C and TARGET_PREFIX completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/4/execution/node/318/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T19:45:52Z

Test stage checkpatch completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/5/execution/node/59/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T19:52:33Z

Test stage Build RPM on CentOS 7 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/5/execution/node/294/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T19:52:42Z

Test stage Build DEB on Ubuntu 20.04 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/5/execution/node/231/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T19:55:11Z

Test stage Build RPM on Leap 15 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/5/execution/node/309/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T20:05:07Z

Test stage Build on CentOS 7 release completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/5/execution/node/339/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T20:05:37Z

Test stage Build on Ubuntu 20.04 with Clang completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/5/execution/node/300/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T20:06:05Z

Test stage Build on CentOS 7 debug completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/5/execution/node/348/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T20:06:47Z

Test stage Build on Leap 15 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/5/execution/node/311/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T20:06:48Z

Test stage Build on CentOS 7 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/5/execution/node/345/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-08T20:08:30Z

Test stage Build on Leap 15 with Intel-C and TARGET_PREFIX completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/5/execution/node/317/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-09T01:29:17Z

Test stage checkpatch completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/6/execution/node/59/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-09T01:35:32Z

Test stage Build RPM on CentOS 7 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/6/execution/node/288/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-09T01:35:44Z

Test stage Build DEB on Ubuntu 20.04 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/6/execution/node/226/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-09T01:38:42Z

Test stage Build RPM on Leap 15 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/6/execution/node/303/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-09T01:46:07Z

Test stage Build on CentOS 7 release completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/6/execution/node/327/log

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-17T16:02:56Z

Test stage checkpatch completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/18/execution/node/60/log

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <tom.nabarro@intel.com>

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-17T17:25:06Z

Test stage checkpatch completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/19/execution/node/61/log

mjmac

Looks good. Few comments and things to address that can be done now or in a follow-on.

mjmac · 2020-12-17T19:50:56Z

So I guess in that case it doesn't matter if the sequence number is reset because it's only relevant to the sender. I assume that the goal would be to retry or something if a corresponding response isn't received in some amount of time? If so, I think I would prefer to keep the retry logic in the MS client rather than adding another layer here.

I think it's fine to leave the sequence number in for now though. We may find another use for it (e.g. distinguishing between N similar events with distinct sequence numbers and N duplicates of the same event).

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <tom.nabarro@intel.com>

…trol-system-event-update3 Conflicts: src/control/common/proto/mgmt/svc.pb.go src/mgmt/svc.pb-c.c

daosbuild1

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-19T23:46:57Z

Test stage Functional_Hardware_Medium completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/21/execution/node/1146/log

…trol-system-event-update3

daosbuild1

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.

daosbuild1 · 2020-12-20T14:09:42Z

Test stage Functional_Hardware_Medium completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-4032/22/execution/node/1090/log

johannlombardi · 2020-12-21T09:56:35Z

+
+enum ras_event_id {
+	RAS_RANK_EXIT	= 1,
+	RAS_RANK_NO_RESP,


Hm, the event ID is supposed to be a 64-byte string as specified on the wiki, no? https://wiki.hpdd.intel.com/display/DC/RAS+Events

johannlombardi · 2020-12-21T09:57:38Z

+		return "daos_rank_no_response";
+	}
+
+	return RAS_ID_UNKNOWN_STR;


I would rather not maintain a list like that and just put everything in the JSON format itself. IMO, the list of event should only be maintained in the documentation.

...pending off-line discussion

One potential solution could be to read a json file on control plane start-up parse each entry and register events with pubsub (each entry would map to a concrete events interface implementation and would have a proto message definition to be used on the C side). This seems more complex to me but it might meet your requirements.

The complexity stems from the fact that we need to share the event structures (including boilerplate RAS details and optional. Extended info which is different for specific event type/topic) between C and go code, there are various approaches for this including:
1- protobuf where we generate helper code from proto schema
2- cgo where we would have the definitions in C and access and use the native C types from go
3- generate native types on both sides from a list of identifiers in a shared location
... (there are probably more)

The current approach (implemented by me with direction from @mjmac) is to use option #3 above with specific event info definitions in proto files, then we have all the auto generated structures for specific event types in C and Go and when raising event we just fill in the details from the shared list of identifiers (in src/daos_srv/ras.h) and populate the auto generated protobuf structures with the relevant event type specific extended info.

Generating event definitions for C and Go from JSON file at runtime or compiletime is not trivial given that we need a schema that understands extended info structure for specific event types. Django framework does this for python and implementation is not trivial.

If we choose to restrict ourselves to a fixed set of event types with predefined event info structures then we could create distinct proto definitions for each event in a JSON blob at compile time. When adding a new event developer would need to:

update json file with new entry

build the protobuf message definitions from the new entry in the json file (by running scons)

add event creation code on C side to populate auto generated proto structs for the new event to be sent over dRPC

add new concrete event type (not topic) on Go side with Un/Marshal methods to convert to/from proto to native and add handler for this new event

I'm not sure this is any more developer friendly than the current implementation, part of the complexity on the go side is because we made a decision to isolate protobuf type usage from internals hence the conversions to native types.

Hope that helps clarify.

johannlombardi · 2020-12-21T09:58:24Z

+	}
+
+	return RAS_ID_UNKNOWN_STR;
+}


Same as above.

mjmac · 2020-12-22T15:11:02Z

@johannlombardi: The overall design of the RAS events needs to be fleshed out a bit more based on how you and others on the ioserver side intend to use this feature. In the meantime, can we land what we have now so that Tom can keep making progress on DAOS-6063 and DAOS-6088? Those can be adjusted pretty easily to fit whatever the shape the new design takes.

johannlombardi

I am fine to land it and to keep the current structure (no json in io engine), but please provide a follow-on patch that changes the event ID to a char[64] as specified in the wiki. We will then flush out the details of the API on the I/O engine side after we are all back from holidays.

…trol-system-event-update3

daosbuild1

LGTM. No errors found by checkpatch.

ashleypittman · 2020-12-23T09:02:15Z

This isn't my area so I'm not sure I can review it and I can't see any change in the testing behaviour.

If you've added me because you think it'll change the "dmg system stop" behaviour as discussed in #4022 then I can take a look at that and see if this solves the issue.

tanabarr · 2020-12-23T12:04:47Z

This isn't my area so I'm not sure I can review it and I can't see any change in the testing behaviour.

If you've added me because you think it'll change the "dmg system stop" behaviour as discussed in #4022 then I can take a look at that and see if this solves the issue.

think Mike might have added you Re: check patch issues on previous runs, thanks. this won't have an effect on system stop behaviour as far as I'm aware

…#4032) Initial implementation of RAS event notifications between control-plane instances and management service. Event definitions described in daos_srv/ras.h as a central location to be accessible from control and data planes. Rank exit event registration and processing implemented. Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <tom.nabarro@intel.com>

tanabarr requested a review from mjmac December 7, 2020 23:15

daosbuild1 reviewed Dec 8, 2020

View reviewed changes

tanabarr mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2020

DAOS-6063 control: event notifications from harness to MS #3999

Closed

tanabarr changed the title ~~Tanabarr/control system event update3~~ DAOS-6063 control: event notifications from harness to MS Dec 8, 2020

Base automatically changed from tanabarr/control-system-event-update2 to master December 8, 2020 19:32

tanabarr force-pushed the tanabarr/control-system-event-update3 branch from 2f2b9d1 to 9aac903 Compare December 17, 2020 15:51

tanabarr added 2 commits December 17, 2020 16:59

add special case RASTypeAny to subscribe to events of any topic

c0d2dae

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <tom.nabarro@intel.com>

split membership from member.go

14ac61e

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <tom.nabarro@intel.com>

tanabarr requested review from kjacque and mjmac December 17, 2020 17:21

mjmac previously approved these changes Dec 17, 2020

View reviewed changes

DAOS-6063 control: event notification code review updates (#4138)

c2d110f

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <tom.nabarro@intel.com>

tanabarr dismissed mjmac’s stale review via c2d110f December 18, 2020 23:07

Merge branch 'master' of github.com:daos-stack/daos into tanabarr/con…

a671be3

…trol-system-event-update3 Conflicts: src/control/common/proto/mgmt/svc.pb.go src/mgmt/svc.pb-c.c

tanabarr requested a review from mjmac December 18, 2020 23:13

daosbuild1 reviewed Dec 18, 2020

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'master' of github.com:daos-stack/daos into tanabarr/con…

79dff4a

…trol-system-event-update3

daosbuild1 reviewed Dec 20, 2020

View reviewed changes

johannlombardi requested changes Dec 21, 2020

View reviewed changes

johannlombardi self-requested a review December 22, 2020 15:23

johannlombardi approved these changes Dec 22, 2020

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'master' of github.com:daos-stack/daos into tanabarr/con…

3113b74

…trol-system-event-update3

daosbuild1 reviewed Dec 22, 2020

View reviewed changes

tanabarr requested a review from a team December 23, 2020 08:14

mjmac approved these changes Dec 23, 2020

View reviewed changes

mjmac merged commit baea574 into master Dec 23, 2020

mjmac deleted the tanabarr/control-system-event-update3 branch December 23, 2020 13:09

Conversation

tanabarr commented Dec 7, 2020 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 8, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 9, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 9, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 9, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 9, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 9, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 17, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 17, 2020

Uh oh!

mjmac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

mjmac Dec 17, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 19, 2020

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

daosbuild1 commented Dec 20, 2020

tanabarr commented Dec 7, 2020 •

edited

Loading

tanabarr Dec 22, 2020 •

edited

Loading