Skip to content

docs: reconcile idea inbox #27

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
yaacovcorcos merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2026
Merged

docs: reconcile idea inbox #27

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion docs/planning/idea-inbox.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -48,5 +48,5 @@ write `Not recorded` rather than guessing.

| Idea | Raised by | Date added | Context or source | Possible area |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **Default project workspace and starting material.** Plan how a new Scient user's basic desktop project workspace should be set up when the app creates and works with local files and folders. | Not recorded | 2026-07-12 | The evaluated skills-system direction now lives in the [Scient Skills System](../product/skills-system.md). Remaining questions include built-in starter guidance, standard places for articles and PDFs, other common project material, what Scient creates automatically, what remains visible versus app-managed, and how non-skill starting material works when opening an existing folder. | Product planning, project-format architecture, onboarding, and product design |
| **Visual literature map.** Add an interactive, Obsidian-style graph view of the literature sources in a Scient project. Sources would appear as nodes, with inspectable relationships such as citations, shared topics, project links, or researcher-created connections. The view should help researchers explore clusters, identify central or isolated sources, review gaps, filter the collection, and open each source in its normal detail view. | Yishai | 2026-07-18 | Spoken idea. The initial scope should focus on sources already imported into the project; broader scholarly-network discovery and the exact relationship types remain open questions. | Source-library product planning, literature-review UX, design, and future source-relationship architecture |
| **Future Scient memory architecture.** Plan Scient's complete memory architecture as a dedicated future product and architecture discovery before selecting schemas, databases, or synchronization machinery. | Not recorded | 2026-07-18 | Questions about project records, conversations, candidate memory scopes, provenance, SQLite, Git, user-selected cloud folders, recovery, privacy, retention, and future Scient cloud sync arose during the first-slice T3 source review. The scopes and boundaries remain unaccepted, and no storage choice is authorized. Detailed candidate scopes and open questions are preserved in [draft PR #23](https://github.com/ScientFactory/Scient/pull/23). | Product planning, future memory architecture, agent runtime, project format, security, provenance, synchronization, and product design |