Repository navigation
馃敡 Generalize AI OCR review context and clarify viewer enhancement - #11
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Resolve the OCR reviewer prompt overlap with the visual-evidence safeguards on main while retaining the viewer enhancement documentation and all intervening changes. Co-authored-by: Codex Web <noreply@openai.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
review_page()prompt now identifies each page as part of the supplied document instead of describing every input as a low-resolution 1974 government scan. This removes an inaccurate assumption when reviewing other PDFs without changing block classification, protected-token handling, or the requirement to use the page image as evidence.OCR.mdnow specifies that both viewer enhancement modes run forced OCR and local AI review, including for documents with existing text, and that the viewer does not reuse cached outputs created without AI review. This documents the viewer-side change in PDF-magic/viewer#187, which also advanced the cache pipeline version; it does not change viewer runtime behavior or caching code here. The documented command uses the AI-reviewed OCR and section-bookmark pipeline introduced in 6eb36a4.