Consider versioning Outcomes like Decision Points

Expanding on:

It seems like we should consider versioning Outcome sets as well. This seems like a relatively easy thing to clone from what we did in #350 and #368 for decision points.

At least partially addressed by #672. Need to review to see if it's fully resolved or not.

Do outcome sets follow the same versioning rules as decision points, or as decision point groups? I guess outcomes are analogous to decision points and outcome sets are analogous to decision point groups?

See also #745

The idea is that an OutcomeGroup is equivalent to a DecisionPoint, and Outcome values are the same as Decision point values.

There is no parallel for DecisionPointGroup on the Outcome side.

flowchart TD
subgraph coo[CollectionOfObjects]
dpg[DecisionPointGroup]
end

subgraph o[Object]
direction LR
dp[DecisionPoint]
og[OutcomeGroup]
end

subgraph v[Value]
direction LR
dpv[DecisionPointValue]
ov[OutcomeValue]
end

coo -->|is grouping of| o
o -->|has ordered list of| v
dp <-- equivalent to --> og
dpv <-- equivalent to --> ov

Resolved by #791

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

Consider versioning Outcomes like Decision Points #454

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Consider versioning Outcomes like Decision Points #454

Description

Activity

ahouseholder commented on Jan 28, 2025

j--- commented on Mar 4, 2025

ahouseholder commented on Mar 20, 2025

ahouseholder commented on Jul 1, 2025

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions