Skip to content

docs: SK-3168: List flowvault unary samples and new options classes - #448

Open
promptless[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
himanshupal/SK-3168-flowvault-Java-parity-fixfrom
promptless/sk-3168-flowvault-unary-docs-gaps
Open

promptless[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
himanshupal/SK-3168-flowvault-Java-parity-fixfrom
promptless/sk-3168-flowvault-unary-docs-gaps

Conversation

@promptless

@promptless promptless Bot commented Oct 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Open in Promptless

Why

#447 (SK-3168) adds four unary operations to flowvault: query, getTokens, uploadFiles, and deleteFiles, each with a sample. The PR documents them in flowvault/README.md, but two reference spots are still incomplete:

  • The Custom Request Headers options table stops at getTokens. UploadFilesOptions and DeleteFilesOptions also accept a RequestInterceptor.
  • flowvault/samples/README.md lists only the bulk samples. It doesn't list any unary sample, including the four new ones.

Goal

  • Add uploadFiles / UploadFilesOptions and deleteFiles / DeleteFilesOptions to the options-class table in flowvault/README.md.
  • List the nine unary samples (InsertExample through DeleteFilesExample) in the samples README. Also note that the shared response-handling pattern described there applies to the bulk samples.

This PR targets the #447 head branch, because main doesn't include these operations yet.

Testing

  • Checked each options class and VaultController method in the SK-3168 flowvault java parity fix #447 head branch (ead4aeb). Checked the sample descriptions against each sample's Javadoc and code.
  • Confirmed that every sample link points to an existing file.

Trigger Events

Comment thread flowvault/README.md Resolved
Comment thread flowvault/samples/README.md Resolved
Comment thread flowvault/samples/README.md Resolved
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.39%. Comparing base (ead4aeb) to head (3024528).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                                Coverage Diff                                @@
##             himanshupal/SK-3168-flowvault-Java-parity-fix     #448    +/-   ##
=================================================================================
  Coverage                                            91.39%   91.39%            
=================================================================================
  Files                                                  197      197            
  Lines                                                 8126     8126            
  Branches                                              1131     1132     +1     
=================================================================================
  Hits                                                  7427     7427            
  Misses                                                 449      449            
  Partials                                               250      250            
Flag Coverage Δ
common 90.19% <ø> (ø)
flowvault 88.96% <ø> (ø)
skyvault 95.02% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flowvault ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
Module: common 90.19% <ø> (ø)
Module: skyvault 95.02% <ø> (ø)
Module: flowvault 88.96% <ø> (ø)
Service Account 87.36% <ø> (ø)
Vault Data 92.13% <ø> (ø)
Vault Tokens 99.03% <ø> (ø)
Vault Connection 100.00% <ø> (ø)
Vault Controller 83.32% <ø> (ø)
Detect 100.00% <ø> (ø)
Audit 100.00% <ø> (ø)
BIN Lookup 100.00% <ø> (ø)
Config 96.26% <ø> (ø)
Utils 90.94% <ø> (ø)
Errors 100.00% <ø> (ø)
Enums 100.00% <ø> (ø)
Logs 96.15% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Harness.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ead4aeb...3024528. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@promptless
promptless Bot marked this pull request as ready for review October 26, 2026 13:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants