Skip to content

Discovery if using lightweight zod package will be an improvement for this codebase #96

Open

Description

@wiktoriavh

Discovery and then potential implementation (or no implementation).

Would it make sense to use the lightweight Zod package here, to make sure it follows the expected types and formats?

Acceptance Criteria

Answer the questions.

  • Use lightweigh zod and compare it to the current code
  • Is it more complicated?
  • Does the bundle size increase by a lot?
  • Is it easy to use and therefore acceptable?

Definiton of Done

It is one or the other, it cannot be both.

  • Create a PR where zod is implemented with an explanation WHY
  • OR: Leave a comment in here explaining WHY zod is not a good option.

Originally posted by @wiktoriavh in #85 (comment)

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]discovery if this could be replaced with the lightweight zod, of if it would be overkill[/-] [+]Discovery if using lightweight zod package will be an improvement for this codebase[/+] on Aug 30, 2026
  2. added
    triagedWhen an issue was triaged by the owner and given the green light for implementation.
    on Aug 30, 2026
  3. added theissue type on Aug 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    triagedWhen an issue was triaged by the owner and given the green light for implementation.

    Type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions