You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm seeing a bug when testing my particle output for this. latParticle seems to be working but not lonParticle.
See below. I select an arbitrary particle number, then manually convert its x/y/z location to lat/lon and check it against the output latParticle/lonParticle.
@bradyrx, great catch. There is a shift in longitude that is needed to correspond to a direct mapping with the mesh, e.g., see be19e75 I needed to add this for consistency with respect to our mesh conversion / coordinate system for the mesh.
If you check for cell centers closest to the particles (which is the metric I used), do you reasonable results? This was how I validated the longitude of the particles.
Activity
pwolfram commentedon Aug 17, 2018
cc @bradyrx @maltrud
pwolfram commentedon Oct 8, 2018
Resolved by #15.
pwolfram commentedon Oct 13, 2018
Closed by #15
bradyrx commentedon Oct 15, 2018
@pwolfram,
I'm seeing a bug when testing my particle output for this. latParticle seems to be working but not lonParticle.
See below. I select an arbitrary particle number, then manually convert its x/y/z location to lat/lon and check it against the output latParticle/lonParticle.
pwolfram commentedon Oct 15, 2018
@bradyrx, great catch. There is a shift in longitude that is needed to correspond to a direct mapping with the mesh, e.g., see be19e75 I needed to add this for consistency with respect to our mesh conversion / coordinate system for the mesh.
If you check for cell centers closest to the particles (which is the metric I used), do you reasonable results? This was how I validated the longitude of the particles.
pwolfram commentedon Oct 15, 2018
@bradyrx, please close (or leave open) until we have this 100% resolved. Thanks!
bradyrx commentedon Oct 15, 2018
@pwolfram,
Thanks for the feedback and suggestion. Just wanted to vet the simple fixes (i.e. lat/lon/global ID) on my own through python and not just paraview.
See below implementation for verification:
bradyrx commentedon Oct 15, 2018
I think you need to do this since I'm not an assignee. No comment & close option for me.
pwolfram commentedon Oct 15, 2018
Thanks!
pwolfram commentedon Nov 30, 2018
Consider including in input in particle initialization.