Validation eliminator

[kl0tl]

Is there a reason for having unV instead of a validation eliminator, like maybe or either? If not, should we deprecate unV in favor of such eliminator?

[JordanMartinez]

I think a validation eliminator makes sense. Maybe wait to deprecate the unV until next breaking changes release?

[hdgarrood]

Is there a problem with having both?

[kl0tl]

I don’t like that unV reads almost like un V while both functions have different types. I suspect it might be confusing to beginners but I’m not sure it’s enough for deprecating unV though.

[hdgarrood]

Oh, sorry, yes. I forgot that unV is already an eliminator. So is the proposal essentially just "rename unV to validation"?

[kl0tl]

I’d like to guide users toward the new eliminator with a warning but otherwise yes, the proposal is essentially renaming unV to validation (to avoid confusion with un V and for consistency with either and maybe).

[JordanMartinez]

We're not going to deprecate unV first?

[thomashoneyman]

Closed in #33 .