[ti-chi-bot]

Check List

Tests

• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Added repository-wide reviewer and approver assignments for changes, using community membership lists to determine who can review and approve them.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Source mode: Auto
• Repository: Unavailable
• Branch: Unavailable
• File: No configuration file from this repository applied
• Commit: Unavailable
• Layers: Organization UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: 8a036686-d833-421f-a227-4b305eecb926

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7adb3bb and 44e2e81.

📒 Files selected for processing: 2

• OWNERS
• OWNERS_ALIASES

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

📝 Walkthrough

The change adds community reviewer and approver aliases to OWNERS_ALIASES. A catch-all rule in OWNERS assigns those groups as reviewers and approvers. Comments identify the documentation and membership source.

Changes: Community ownership

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Community aliases and catch-all rule OWNERS_ALIASES, OWNERS	OWNERS_ALIASES defines the sig-community-reviewers and sig-community-approvers member lists. OWNERS assigns these groups through a catch-all rule. Comments link to OWNERS documentation and identify the membership source.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Change: Other

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 44e2e

The ownership configuration change is mergeable with no identified blocking risk.

Pre-merge checks: 4 · 1

Failed checks: 1 warning

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check		The description only includes a test checklist. It does not provide the required problem summary, change details, implementation details, or related changes.	Complete the required template sections: describe the problem, explain what changed and how it works, and document any related changes or release-branch cherry-pick requirements.

Passed checks: 4 passed

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check		The title clearly identifies the main change: automatic synchronization of OWNERS files from community membership.
Docstring Coverage		No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check		Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (2 skipped: 2 unsupported.)

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{A rabbit checks the owners list,
And finds two groups tucked in.
Reviewers hop beside approvers,
A catch-all rule lets both begin.
The burrow’s ownership is set.}

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[ti-chi-bot]

/release-note-none