docs: add engineering best-practices (AI readiness) audit - #37
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Audits the repo against the 49-item engineering best-practices checklist and records evidence, verdicts, scoring, and prioritized remediation. Index the report from the README alongside the existing docs.
amitiwari1411
approved these changes
Sep 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds
docs/engineering-best-practices-audit.md— an evidence-based AI-readiness audit of thisrepo against the 49-item engineering best-practices checklist (rubric
item-credit-v1,2026-09-04) — and indexes it from the README under a new Repo Health section.
This is documentation only. No source, test, CI, or config behavior changes.
Headline results
(14 Met + 0.5 x 9 Partial) / (49 - 9 N/A)Critical gates are RED because of three items: AGENTS.md (absent), README setup & run
instructions (the README is a link index with no description, install, or dev-loop steps), and
required CI checks before merge — six jobs run on every PR, but org ruleset
require-pr-review(id 3174764) carries no
required_status_checksrule, so a red build does not block a merge. Theother applicable gates (branch protection, secret scanning, SAST, unit tests, integration tests,
scoped secrets, lockfiles) are Met.
What the audit covers
src/layout, hatchling wheel + git tag release),Python 3.10 /
uv/ruff/pytest/poe, external surfaces Snowflake, S3, andOuterbounds; no deployed runtime, no owned schema, no UI. Ownership verified as
patterninc,so inherited Wiz and Toolsmith controls apply (Wiz check runs observed on PR docs: document TABLE_OWNERSHIP_REGISTRY as a daily-refreshed table #34's head).
ruleset ids, observed check runs).
DB, nothing deployed, no owned schema).
rather than the source tree, and the
Check Versionjob makes a forgotten version bump fail ona duplicate tag.
Notes for review
The audit is a snapshot of commit
60ea68eonmain; open PRs (#33 mkdocs, #35 agent env config,#36 Release Please) are referenced as in-flight but not credited as Met. CI does not run on this
PR — the workflow's
paths-ignoreexcludesREADME.mdanddocs/**.Oly run: https://oly.pattern.com/runs/01a08ef6-1ea4-74cc-9aa2-36cc47a9c05d
Requested by: amitkumar.tiwari@pattern.com