Repository navigation
fix: geometric planners now correctly report their support for asymmetric edge validation - #1474
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…tric edge validation
mamoll
requested changes
Sep 20, 2026
mamoll
left a comment
mamoll
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's a lot of fixes! Thanks.
I have one comment. Rest looks good.
mamoll
approved these changes
Sep 25, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Turns out most of the planners incorrectly report whether they can handle state spaces with asymmetric edge validation! I've gone ahead and fixed all the ones that are easy changes.