docs: drop other NIPs' names from a package's own README description - #12
Merged
Conversation
nip16/nip33 said "folded into NIP-01 upstream" and nipcash/nipcw said "NIP-47" -- rephrased to describe the relationship without naming the other NIP, trimmed to match the terse style of the surrounding entries.
naliyi
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 7, 2026 08:53
naliyi
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2026
Covers the three merged-but-unreleased PRs since v0.2.7: the NWC client NIP-44 fallback + CLOSED-message fixes (#14), the relay combined-kind cursor fairness fix (#15), and the nipcash/nipcw Hub connection bech32 encoding (#16). PR #12 (README wording cleanup) is docs-only and not user-facing, so it's omitted per house style.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Several package one-liners in the Supported NIPs list named a different NIP inside their own description (nip16/nip33 said "folded into NIP-01", nipcash/nipcw said "NIP-47"). Rephrased to describe the relationship without the cross-reference, kept as short as the surrounding entries.