[DSD-9358] image movement from dev to qa

[gaganamadival]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated deployment image list: removed one outdated image and added three new service images (UI, partner-management, policy-management) to reflect current releases and streamline deployments.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Updated release/vidivi/images.txt: removed one outdated image entry and added three new development image entries for pmp-ui-v2, partner-management-service, and policy-management-service.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Image configuration release/vidivi/images.txt	Removed mosipdev2/inji-web:release-0.15.x 0.15.x; added mosipdev/pmp-ui-v2:develop develop, mosipdev/partner-management-service:develop develop, and mosipdev/policy-management-service:develop develop.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Single-file, simple text edits to an images list; no logic changes.

Possibly related PRs

• [DSD-9233] image movement from dev2 to qa #1375 — removes the same mosipdev2/inji-web:release-0.15.x entry.
• [DSD-9175] mosipdev2 to mosipqa #1351 — touches the same inji-web image entry (remove/replace patterns).
• [DSD-9279] move images from dev to dev2 #1398 — adds the same three mosipdev/*:develop image entries.

Poem

🐰 I hopped through lines both old and new,

I nudged one out and welcomed three — woohoo!
pmp-ui, partner, policy in a row,
Development carrots set to grow 🍃🥕
A rabbit's cheer for images on show

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: moving Docker images from development to QA environment, which matches the removal of a dev image and addition of develop-tagged images.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 834f20b and 87d6e99.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• release/vidivi/images.txt (1 hunks)

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7e36e1c and 834f20b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• release/vidivi/images.txt (1 hunks)