Fix longer type-only property access in non-emitting heritage clauses - #37264
Merged
Andrew Branch (andrewbranch) merged 2 commits intoMar 9, 2020
Merged
Conversation
Sheetal Nandi (sheetalkamat)
approved these changes
Mar 9, 2020
Member
Author
|
TypeScript Bot (@typescript-bot) cherry-pick this to release-3.8 |
Contributor
|
Heya Andrew Branch (@andrewbranch), I've started to run the task to cherry-pick this into |
Wesley Wigham (weswigham)
approved these changes
Mar 9, 2020
Contributor
|
Hey Andrew Branch (@andrewbranch), I've opened #37299 for you. |
TypeScript Bot (typescript-bot)
pushed a commit
to typescript-bot/TypeScript
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2020
Andrew Branch (andrewbranch)
added a commit
to typescript-bot/TypeScript
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 9, 2020
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reported in of #36478 (comment) / #36496
Would like to get this in 3.8.4 if possible.