add Array.prototype.filter signature with type guard - #10916
add Array.prototype.filter signature with type guard#10916Michael Maier (maiermic) wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
|
Hi Michael Maier (@maiermic), I'm your friendly neighborhood Microsoft Pull Request Bot (You can call me MSBOT). Thanks for your contribution! The agreement was validated by Microsoft and real humans are currently evaluating your PR. TTYL, MSBOT; |
|
thanks Michael Maier (@maiermic), some baslines changed, you will need to do a |
Mohamed Hegazy (mhegazy)
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We will need to update the baselines as well. gulp baseline-accept will do the trick.
|
Mohamed Hegazy (@mhegazy) Thanks, I appreciate your help. |
|
waiting on the CI. |
|
Mohamed Hegazy (@mhegazy) Two tests failed on my machine. I ran Update: Tests passed on my machine and I pushed my changes. Waiting on the CI again 😅 |
|
Mohamed Hegazy (@mhegazy) Is it possible to merge this? |
|
Sorry this fell off my list for a while. one more comment, we need to update the filter method on ReadOnlyArray, and the TypedArray varients, e.g. Int32Array (all in the same file). |
|
Mohamed Hegazy (@mhegazy) This pull request only updates |
|
Mohamed Hegazy (@mhegazy) Could you review again taking into account latest comment #10916 (comment)? |
|
Michael Maier (@maiermic) Mohamed Hegazy (@mhegazy) any updates? I could resolve the conflicts and create new pr if you need. |
# Conflicts: # tests/baselines/reference/arrayFilter.symbols # tests/baselines/reference/arrayFilter.types # tests/baselines/reference/declarationEmitPromise.symbols # tests/baselines/reference/declarationEmitPromise.types # tests/baselines/reference/genericMethodOverspecialization.symbols # tests/baselines/reference/genericMethodOverspecialization.types
|
Teppei Sato (@teppeis) Conflicts are resolved by my latest update. I'm waiting for Mohamed Hegazy (@mhegazy) to merge. |
|
What's the status on this? |
|
Mohamed Hegazy (@mhegazy) Michael Maier (@maiermic) What is happening with this? |
|
This has been solved by #16223 in the meantime. |
See #7657 and #10027