Skip to content

Docs review/white label extension - #22

Merged
bkatusic merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs-review/white-label-extension
Mar 23, 2026
Merged

bkatusic merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs-review/white-label-extension

Conversation

@bkatusic

@bkatusic bkatusic commented Mar 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Refined navigation instructions in White Label Extension documentation to reflect current UI labels
    • Expanded guidance on visually-hiding functionality and clarified branding field behavior
    • Enhanced configuration option descriptions for improved clarity and usability
    • Updated support form settings with more specific parameter naming and new options
    • Improved option table entries with clearer, more specific phrasing throughout
    • Updated version to 5.0.3

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Mar 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

Updated MDX documentation for the White Label Extension add-on: changed product URLs from /extension/white-label/ to /add-on/white-label/, bumped version to 5.0.3, revised navigation instructions to reflect new UI labels, expanded feature guidance, and rephrased multiple option table entries with more specific wording.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
White Label Extension Documentation
add-ons/agency/white-label-extension.mdx
Updated embedded metadata (purchase URL and version), revised step-by-step navigation instructions across multiple sections to reflect UI label changes ("Manage" → "Manage Sites", "Edit" → "Settings"), expanded toggle guidance, and rephrased option table entries with more specific language for available and configuration options.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Docs review/white label extension' is partially related to the changeset. It mentions the white label extension, which is correct, but uses vague phrasing ('Docs review') that doesn't clearly convey the specific nature of the updates—namely that the documentation was revised to reflect UI changes, navigation path updates, and configuration option clarifications. Consider a more specific title that describes the actual changes, such as 'Update White Label Extension docs with revised UI labels and paths' or 'Revise White Label Extension documentation for UI and path updates'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs-review/white-label-extension

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
add-ons/agency/white-label-extension.mdx (1)

251-251: Refine this setting label for readability.

“Message to return sender to page they were on” is hard to parse in a settings table. Consider a shorter label like “Return link message” (or “Message for return link to previous page”).

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@add-ons/agency/white-label-extension.mdx` at line 251, Replace the
hard-to-read table label "Message to return sender to page they were on" with a
shorter, clearer label such as "Return link message" (or alternatively "Message
for return link to previous page") in the settings table row that currently
contains that text so the setting is immediately understandable to users.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Nitpick comments:
In `@add-ons/agency/white-label-extension.mdx`:
- Line 251: Replace the hard-to-read table label "Message to return sender to
page they were on" with a shorter, clearer label such as "Return link message"
(or alternatively "Message for return link to previous page") in the settings
table row that currently contains that text so the setting is immediately
understandable to users.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 85e80c8d-a916-48a8-8df2-3e0d144944a0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f1c7a29 and 878a412.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • add-ons/agency/white-label-extension.mdx

@bkatusic
bkatusic merged commit b29afb0 into main Mar 23, 2026
3 checks passed
@bkatusic
bkatusic deleted the docs-review/white-label-extension branch March 23, 2026 14:54
@mintlify

mintlify Bot commented Mar 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project Status Preview Updated (UTC)
mainwp 🔴 Failed Mar 23, 2026, 3:53 PM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant