policy: Bun is tier 1, Deno is being removed — correct local CLAUDE.md - #195
Conversation
Owner ruling 2026-08-26: "deno is to go and bun is the way we are going, put it
first everywhere unless not possible and explain why if not".
This file is what an agent reads FIRST and it listed Bun as BANNED with Deno as
its replacement. Correcting hyperpolymath/standards (#655) fixes one copy of
~372 - agents read the local one. This is that local copy.
ALLOWED **Deno** "Replaces Node/npm/bun" -> **Bun** tier 1
BANNED | Bun | Deno | -> row REMOVED
BANNED Node.js / npm / pnpm/yarn -> Deno -> -> Bun
rule "No package.json for runtime deps - use deno.json imports"
-> Use package.json + bun.lock; a manifest is REQUIRED
rule "No node_modules in production"
-> bun install --production, pinned via bun.lock
pkg JS deps: Deno -> JS deps: Bun (package.json + bun.lock), bunx
WHY THE MANIFEST RULE MATTERS MOST. "No package.json for runtime deps" did not
express a preference - it told repos not to declare their dependencies at all.
hyperpolymath/ubicity imported zod and glob, shipped NO manifest of any kind,
and could not build under ANY toolchain. Fixed in ubicity#107; the rule that
caused it is fixed here.
ALSO REPAIRED - blanking scars from the ReScript purge, which substituted the
token with an EMPTY STRING rather than removing the text:
| | AffineScript | -> | ReScript | AffineScript |
1. **No new files** ... -> **No new ReScript files** ...
| **JavaScript** | Only where cannot | -> Only where AffineScript cannot
Restoring the NAME in a policy table does not reintroduce the language. Same
root cause as the rm -rf /lib found in wordpress-tools#62.
Policy text only - no code, no workflows, no build files. 2 file(s).
NOT FOLDED IN: "Fallback: Nix (flake.nix)" is stale (Guix superseded Nix per
ADR-2026-STACK-MIGRATION) but that is a separate ruling; flagged, not changed.
Up to standards ✅🟢 Issues
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR successfully updates the policy to establish Bun as the Tier 1 JS/TS runtime and replaces references to Node.js/npm. However, there is a mismatch between the PR description and the actual changes: the restoration of 'ReScript' labels is missing, with 'TypeScript' being used in some places instead. Additionally, while Deno is being phased out, it is not explicitly listed in the BANNED tables of the modified CLAUDE.md files. Explicitly banning Deno is recommended to prevent LLMs from generating Deno-specific code or configurations.
About this PR
- The PR description explicitly claims to repair 'blanking scars from the ReScript purge' by restoring the 'ReScript' name. However, the changes either leave those lines unchanged or use the label 'TypeScript' instead. Please align the implementation with the stated intent or update the description to reflect the move to TypeScript.
Test suggestions
- Found recommended test scenario: Verify Bun is listed as the Tier 1 runtime with manifest requirements
- Found recommended test scenario: Verify banned tools list points to Bun for Node/npm/pnpm/yarn replacements
- Found recommended test scenario: Verify enforcement rules require package.json and bun.lock instead of Deno config
- Missing recommended test scenario: Verify restoration of 'ReScript' name in policy tables and enforcement rules per description
Prompt proposal for missing tests
Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Missing recommended test scenario: Verify restoration of 'ReScript' name in policy tables and enforcement rules per description
Low confidence findings
- The 'was' states described for the JavaScript usage rule in the PR description (e.g., '| JavaScript | Only where cannot |') do not match the old hunk in the diff, which contained the word 'AffineScript'. This suggests the PR description may be based on an outdated version of the file.
TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback
| | pnpm/yarn | Deno | | ||
| | Node.js | Bun | | ||
| | npm | Bun | | ||
| | pnpm/yarn | Bun | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 MEDIUM RISK
Suggestion: Add Deno to the BANNED list to ensure consistency with the new Bun-first policy and prevent the use of Deno-specific patterns.
| | pnpm/yarn | Bun | | |
| pnpm/yarn | Bun | | |
| Deno | Bun | |
| | pnpm/yarn | Deno | | ||
| | Node.js | Bun | | ||
| | npm | Bun | | ||
| | pnpm/yarn | Bun | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 MEDIUM RISK
Suggestion: Since Deno is being replaced by Bun as the Tier 1 runtime, it should be explicitly listed in the BANNED table to prevent AI agents from suggesting Deno-specific tools or APIs.
| | pnpm/yarn | Bun | | |
| pnpm/yarn | Bun | | |
| Deno | Bun | |
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe two ChangesBun policy migration
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
🔍 Hypatia Security ScanFindings: 56 issues detected
View findings[
{
"reason": "Required file missing (condition: public_repo)",
"type": "missing_requirement",
"file": "SECURITY.md",
"action": "create",
"rule_module": "cicd_rules",
"severity": "high"
},
{
"reason": "Agda postulate assumes without proof -- potential soundness hole (1 occurrences, CWE-704)",
"type": "agda_postulate",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/proofs/agda/FilesystemModel.agda",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "critical"
},
{
"reason": "believe_me undermines formal verification (2 occurrences, CWE-704)",
"type": "believe_me",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/proofs/idris2/src/Filesystem/Axioms.idr",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "critical"
},
{
"reason": "unsafe block -- requires SAFETY comment (16 occurrences, CWE-676)",
"type": "unsafe_block",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/commands.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "as_ptr exposes raw pointer that may dangle or alias unsafely (6 occurrences, CWE-676)",
"type": "as_ptr",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/commands.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "expect() in hot path (4 occurrences, CWE-754)",
"type": "expect_in_hot_path",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/parser.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "unsafe block -- requires SAFETY comment (2 occurrences, CWE-676)",
"type": "unsafe_block",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/process_sub.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "as_ptr exposes raw pointer that may dangle or alias unsafely (2 occurrences, CWE-676)",
"type": "as_ptr",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/process_sub.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "unwrap() without prior check -- DoS via panic (1 occurrences, CWE-754)",
"type": "unwrap_without_check",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/test_command.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "high"
},
{
"reason": "expect() in hot path (1 occurrences, CWE-754)",
"type": "expect_in_hot_path",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/external.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
}
]Powered by Hypatia Neurosymbolic CI/CD Intelligence |
Review feedback from codacy-production and coderabbitai on the policy wave. Three substantive points, all accepted: 1. ".ts CONTRADICTION" (codacy, MEDIUM, raised on most of the wave). The Bun row said "Executes .ts directly, no build step" in a file whose BANNED table bans TypeScript. OWNER RULING: TypeScript "should not exist at all", so advertising Bun's TypeScript capability is wrong regardless of whether it is true. Every .ts reference is removed from the row, including "JS/TS" in its label. 2. "DENO MISSING FROM BANNED" (codacy, raised repeatedly). The wave removed Deno from ALLOWED but never added it to BANNED, so the ruling was only half expressed. Added | Deno | Bun |. 3. "UNPINNED bunx" (coderabbitai, Security & Privacy). A bare `bunx <tool>` can fetch a package outside package.json/bun.lock, and can start Node via a shebang - both contrary to estate SHA-pinning doctrine and the Node ban. Guidance now requires a declared devDependency plus `bunx --no-install --bun <tool>`. NOT taken: "a npm-compatible" (LanguageTool is wrong, "an" is correct before a vowel sound); "--frozen-lockfile is redundant" (correct - no change needed, and none made); the Nix->Guix point (real, but a separate ruling, deliberately not folded into a Deno/Bun change).
🔍 Hypatia Security ScanFindings: 56 issues detected
View findings[
{
"reason": "Required file missing (condition: public_repo)",
"type": "missing_requirement",
"file": "SECURITY.md",
"action": "create",
"rule_module": "cicd_rules",
"severity": "high"
},
{
"reason": "Agda postulate assumes without proof -- potential soundness hole (1 occurrences, CWE-704)",
"type": "agda_postulate",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/proofs/agda/FilesystemModel.agda",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "critical"
},
{
"reason": "believe_me undermines formal verification (2 occurrences, CWE-704)",
"type": "believe_me",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/proofs/idris2/src/Filesystem/Axioms.idr",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "critical"
},
{
"reason": "unsafe block -- requires SAFETY comment (16 occurrences, CWE-676)",
"type": "unsafe_block",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/commands.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "as_ptr exposes raw pointer that may dangle or alias unsafely (6 occurrences, CWE-676)",
"type": "as_ptr",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/commands.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "expect() in hot path (4 occurrences, CWE-754)",
"type": "expect_in_hot_path",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/parser.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "unsafe block -- requires SAFETY comment (2 occurrences, CWE-676)",
"type": "unsafe_block",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/process_sub.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "as_ptr exposes raw pointer that may dangle or alias unsafely (2 occurrences, CWE-676)",
"type": "as_ptr",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/process_sub.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "unwrap() without prior check -- DoS via panic (1 occurrences, CWE-754)",
"type": "unwrap_without_check",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/test_command.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "high"
},
{
"reason": "expect() in hot path (1 occurrences, CWE-754)",
"type": "expect_in_hot_path",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/external.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
}
]Powered by Hypatia Neurosymbolic CI/CD Intelligence |
Addresses the two live static-analysis findings on this PR. ReScript was absent from the BANNED table although canon bans it (destination AffineScript), so the table read as permitting it. Enforcement Rule 3 said `bun install --production` with no `--frozen-lockfile`, so a lockfile mismatch silently re-resolved instead of failing, which defeats the point of committing `bun.lock`. Enforcement Rule 1 is deliberately untouched: standards#655 records that collision as not resolvable unilaterally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
🔍 Hypatia Security ScanFindings: 56 issues detected
View findings[
{
"reason": "Required file missing (condition: public_repo)",
"type": "missing_requirement",
"file": "SECURITY.md",
"action": "create",
"rule_module": "cicd_rules",
"severity": "high"
},
{
"reason": "Agda postulate assumes without proof -- potential soundness hole (1 occurrences, CWE-704)",
"type": "agda_postulate",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/proofs/agda/FilesystemModel.agda",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "critical"
},
{
"reason": "believe_me undermines formal verification (2 occurrences, CWE-704)",
"type": "believe_me",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/proofs/idris2/src/Filesystem/Axioms.idr",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "critical"
},
{
"reason": "unsafe block -- requires SAFETY comment (16 occurrences, CWE-676)",
"type": "unsafe_block",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/commands.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "as_ptr exposes raw pointer that may dangle or alias unsafely (6 occurrences, CWE-676)",
"type": "as_ptr",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/commands.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "expect() in hot path (4 occurrences, CWE-754)",
"type": "expect_in_hot_path",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/parser.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "unsafe block -- requires SAFETY comment (2 occurrences, CWE-676)",
"type": "unsafe_block",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/process_sub.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "as_ptr exposes raw pointer that may dangle or alias unsafely (2 occurrences, CWE-676)",
"type": "as_ptr",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/process_sub.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
},
{
"reason": "unwrap() without prior check -- DoS via panic (1 occurrences, CWE-754)",
"type": "unwrap_without_check",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/test_command.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "high"
},
{
"reason": "expect() in hot path (1 occurrences, CWE-754)",
"type": "expect_in_hot_path",
"file": "/home/runner/work/valence-shell/valence-shell/impl/rust-cli/src/external.rs",
"action": "flag",
"rule_module": "code_safety",
"severity": "medium"
}
]Powered by Hypatia Neurosymbolic CI/CD Intelligence |
Owner ruling, 2026-08-26:
This repo's
.claude/CLAUDE.mdis what an agent reads first. Correctinghyperpolymath/standards(#655) fixes one copy of ~372 — agents read the local one.What this PR actually changes
Every line below was verified present in this PR's own diff — nothing is claimed that isn't here.
| Bun | Deno |row removedpackage.json+bun.lock)bun install --productionreplaces the node_modules rulebunx --no-install --bunOnly where cannot→ Only where AffineScript cannotReview feedback addressed
.tsdirectly" inside a file that bans TypeScript. Owner ruling: TypeScript should not exist at all — so every.tsreference is gone from the row, including JS/TS in its label. It now reads JS runtime, running compiled ESM/JS.bunx(coderabbitai, Security & Privacy): a barebunx <tool>can fetch a package outsidebun.lockand can start Node via a shebang. Guidance now requires a declared devDependency plusbunx --no-install --bun.Not taken: "a npm-compatible" (LanguageTool is wrong — "an" is correct before a vowel sound); "
--frozen-lockfileis redundant" (correct, and no such flag was added); the Nix → Guix point (real, but a separate ruling — deliberately not folded into a Deno/Bun change).Scope
Policy text only — no code, no workflows, no build files.
Related: #655 (governing document), #658 (Deno→Bun assessment: 18 repos blocked on
@affinescript/*npm packages that do not exist), #659 (policy duplicated into ~372 copies).