Skip to content

"Phacopsis oxyspora cf. var. defecta Triebel & Rambold" should be treated similar to "Phacopsis cf. oxyspora" #216

Description

@dimus

@abubelinha mentioned in gnames/gnverifier#64

Currently parsing of cf. annotation works only for species Aus cf. bus but not for infraspecies Aus bus cf. cus

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]"Phacopsis cf. oxyspora" should be parsed as surrogate[/-] [+]"Phacopsis oxyspora cf. var. defecta Triebel & Rambold" should be treated similar to "Phacopsis cf. oxyspora"[/+] on Nov 26, 2021
  2. Archilegt commented on Aug 22, 2022

    @Archilegt

    Related article in the ZooCode:
    5.3. Typographical signs and qualifying abbreviations excluded. A typographical sign such as ?, and an abbreviation such as aff., prox. or cf., when used to qualify the application of a scientific name, does not form part of the name of a taxon even when inserted between the components of a name.
    See also "Open nomenclature" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_nomenclature

  3. abubelinha commented on Aug 25, 2022

    @abubelinha

    Even if those modifiers are not part of the names, I think the point here is being able to match names found in not-so-clean taxonomic lists (which sometimes contain those modifiers, as mentioned in gnames/gnverifier#64).
    @abubelinha

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions