chore: add FUNDING.yml

[EtienneLescot]

Adds .github/FUNDING.yml so GitHub displays a Sponsor button on the repository.

github: [EtienneLescot]

Single file, no other changes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Updated the Community section to label sponsorship as “Support the project.”
  • Added a Ko-fi support link alongside the existing GitHub Sponsors option.

• Chores

  • Added Ko-fi to the project’s funding information.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Team

Run ID: be83c3ef-f63a-45a8-b8be-3155d339e9ec

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 48d340c and 416cf2d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .github/FUNDING.yml
• README.md

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)

• .github/FUNDING.yml
• README.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 8 included reviews per hour; 4 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The repository adds a Ko-fi funding account to .github/FUNDING.yml and updates the Community section of README.md with GitHub Sponsors and Ko-fi support links.

Changes

Funding metadata

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Add funding accounts and support links .github/FUNDING.yml, README.md	The funding configuration adds ko_fi: etiennelescot. The Community support bullet now includes GitHub Sponsors and Ko-fi links.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 416cf

This change adds repository sponsorship information and updates the README; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains, so it is merge-ready after normal checks and review.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	⚠️ Warning	The description explains the intended funding change, but it omits the required template sections for the related issue, change type, release impact, desktop impact, screenshots or video, and testing.…	Complete all required template sections. Describe the README and Ko-fi changes, select the applicable change type and release impact, indicate platform impact, state whether screenshots are not applicable, and document testing performed.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title identifies the primary change, which adds .github/FUNDING.yml. It is concise and related to the pull request, although it does not mention the README update or Ko-fi support.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

Full details: Description check

Explanation

The description explains the intended funding change, but it omits the required template sections for the related issue, change type, release impact, desktop impact, screenshots or video, and testing. It also incorrectly states that the pull request contains a single file, while the changes include README.md and a ko_fi funding entry.

Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (2 skipped: 2 unsupported.)

• Fix all pre-merge checks with AI

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/funding-file

Warning

Git: CodeRabbit could not clone the repository, so clone-backed analysis was skipped and this review may be incomplete. Verify repository clone access, such as SSH credentials, before requesting another full review. If clone access is intentionally unavailable, use path_filters to narrow the review scope.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}