Repository navigation
[conformance] Promote gf10 and gf256 to bitexact_selfconsistent (WP-34) - #4763
Merged
Merged
Conversation
The turn ended with these files edited and never committed. Uncommitted work is invisible to the review - it reads the branch - so the attempt would have been released as empty and the next bee would have started beside this work rather than from it. This commit is not a claim that the work is correct. It is the bee's work, committed on its behalf, and it is judged exactly like any other: the adversarial reviewer reads it, the compiler runs on it, and the issue's own criteria are measured against it. Issue: #1215 Turn: c99e278f-8779-4ef2-af4e-4dc886638d58 Ending: finished (the turn closed) Committed: 2 path(s) Left uncommitted: 0 path(s) outside the declared boundary
A pull request must add exactly one docs/now entry and a bee has no way to know that: its brief names a boundary file and acceptance criteria, and docs/now/ is neither. The publisher adds it rather than failing the gate. Closes #1215 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
gHashTag
enabled auto-merge (squash)
September 24, 2026 04:25
Contributor
|
📓 NotebookLM Notebook linked to this PR
This notebook contains session context, decisions, and artifacts for this work. |
This was referenced Sep 24, 2026
Contributor
This was referenced Oct 7, 2026
gHashTag
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2026
…ks (Closes #7457) (#7458) b5b852f (#4730) made gf16's infinities strict-JSON strings and e91cb7e (#4763) hand-edited the gf10 and gf256 prose; neither updated the sha256 in INDEX_all_formats.json, so WP-18 check C went red on master. Regenerated with gen_all_formats.py from the committed SSOT rather than editing hashes by hand: gf10's notes return to the generator's text, the gf16 and gf256 digests are recorded, and tnf16 picks up the catalog's phi_distance 0.0417 from 2e4093d (#4795). All 21 gf16 rows decode under gf16.t27 (S1E6M9, bias 31) to their recorded decoded_f64_hex. The WP-18 gate is CLEAN. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #1215
Written by a bee on
queen-1215and published bytools/queen/publish.py. The branch itself is the bee's; the second commit is the coordination entry every pull request must add, which a bee has no way to know about.🤖 Generated with Claude Code