Skip to content

Update mdformat dependency to accommodate 1.0.0 version bump. #12

Closed

Description

@alec-bike

Describe the bug

mdformat just bumped their version to 1.0.0 -- this falls outside the mdformat-footnote dependency range mdformat>=0.7.8,<0.8.0.

Request: update version range for mdformat to accommodate the new version.

Reproduce the bug

❯ uv tool install mdformat@1.0.0 -w mdformat-footnote -w mdformat-mkdocs
  × No solution found when resolving dependencies:
  ╰─▶ Because only the following versions of mdformat-footnote are available:
          mdformat-footnote==0.0.2
          mdformat-footnote==0.0.3
          mdformat-footnote==0.0.4
          mdformat-footnote==0.1.0
          mdformat-footnote==0.1.1
      and mdformat-footnote<=0.0.4 depends on mdformat>=0.5.3,<0.6.0, we can conclude that mdformat-footnote<0.1.0 depends on mdformat>=0.5.3,<0.6.0.
      And because mdformat-footnote==0.1.0 depends on mdformat>=0.7.0,<0.8.0 and mdformat>=0.7.8,<0.8.0, we can conclude that all versions of
      mdformat-footnote depend on one of:
          mdformat>=0.5.3,<0.6.0
          mdformat>=0.7.0,<0.8.0

      And because you require mdformat==1.0.0 and mdformat-footnote, we can conclude that your requirements are unsatisfiable.

List your environment

No response

Activity

  1. alec-bike commented on Oct 18, 2025

    @alec-bike
    Author

    I cloned mdformat-footnote, removed the upper bound on the mdformat version and tested locally with mdformat@1.0.0. Works fine.

  2. self-assigned this
    on Oct 18, 2025
  3. added theissue type on Oct 18, 2025
  4. KyleKing commented on Oct 19, 2025

    @KyleKing
    Collaborator

    This repository is missing a secret in order to support publishing. I'll see what I can do about sorting that out

  5. KyleKing commented on Oct 19, 2025

    @KyleKing
    Collaborator
  6. gaige commented on Oct 19, 2025

    @gaige
    Collaborator

    With the update to using secure publishing, the credentials should no longer be necessary. Looks like re-tagging v0.1.2 resulted in the expected publication. Thanks for raising this issue.

  7. kdeldycke commented on Oct 20, 2025

    @kdeldycke

    I confirm that the mdformat_footnote == 0.1.2 package on PyPi solved this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

bugSomething isn't working

Type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions