You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Update mdformat dependency to accommodate 1.0.0 version bump. #12
mdformat just bumped their version to 1.0.0 -- this falls outside the mdformat-footnote dependency range mdformat>=0.7.8,<0.8.0.
Request: update version range for mdformat to accommodate the new version.
Reproduce the bug
❯ uv tool install mdformat@1.0.0 -w mdformat-footnote -w mdformat-mkdocs
× No solution found when resolving dependencies:
╰─▶ Because only the following versions of mdformat-footnote are available:
mdformat-footnote==0.0.2
mdformat-footnote==0.0.3
mdformat-footnote==0.0.4
mdformat-footnote==0.1.0
mdformat-footnote==0.1.1
and mdformat-footnote<=0.0.4 depends on mdformat>=0.5.3,<0.6.0, we can conclude that mdformat-footnote<0.1.0 depends on mdformat>=0.5.3,<0.6.0.
And because mdformat-footnote==0.1.0 depends on mdformat>=0.7.0,<0.8.0 and mdformat>=0.7.8,<0.8.0, we can conclude that all versions of
mdformat-footnote depend on one of:
mdformat>=0.5.3,<0.6.0
mdformat>=0.7.0,<0.8.0
And because you require mdformat==1.0.0 and mdformat-footnote, we can conclude that your requirements are unsatisfiable.
With the update to using secure publishing, the credentials should no longer be necessary. Looks like re-tagging v0.1.2 resulted in the expected publication. Thanks for raising this issue.
Activity
The whole mdformat ecosystem is borken
alec-bike commentedon Oct 18, 2025
I cloned
mdformat-footnote, removed the upper bound on themdformatversion and tested locally withmdformat@1.0.0. Works fine.KyleKing commentedon Oct 19, 2025
This repository is missing a secret in order to support publishing. I'll see what I can do about sorting that out
KyleKing commentedon Oct 19, 2025
Requested credentials here: https://github.com/orgs/executablebooks/discussions/1196#discussioncomment-14719728 🤞🏻
gaige commentedon Oct 19, 2025
With the update to using secure publishing, the credentials should no longer be necessary. Looks like re-tagging v0.1.2 resulted in the expected publication. Thanks for raising this issue.
mdformat_footnote == 0.1.2 fixes mdformat compatibility
kdeldycke commentedon Oct 20, 2025
I confirm that the
mdformat_footnote == 0.1.2package on PyPi solved this issue.