Skip to content

Consider to use CLAHub #14

Closed
Closed

Description

@forki

I know it's a lawers question, but CLAHub would make things much easier than the current process.
https://www.clahub.com/

Activity

  1. KevinRansom commented on Jan 14, 2015

    @KevinRansom
    Contributor

    I’m sure that it would, and I will forward the suggestion to our legal folks.

    Thanks for the heads up

    Kevin

    From: Steffen Forkmann [mailto:notifications@github.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 12:56 AM
    To: Microsoft/visualfsharp
    Subject: [visualfsharp] Consider to use CLAHub (#14)

    I know it's a lawers question, but CLAHub would make things much easier than the current process.
    https://www.clahub.com/

    —
    Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/14.

  2. ctaggart commented on Jan 14, 2015

    @ctaggart
    Contributor

    There is also a Microsoft Contribution License Agreements bot. See its activity:
    https://github.com/msftclas?tab=activity

  3. KevinRansom commented on Jan 15, 2015

    @KevinRansom
    Contributor

    I chatted with our legal guys. There are good reasons for managing CLA's the way we do now. They tell me the process will get more straightforward than it currently is over time.

    Closing

  4. added a commit that references this issue on Oct 19, 2016
  5. added a commit that references this issue on Nov 27, 2016
  6. added a commit that references this issue on Feb 26, 2017
  7. added a commit that references this issue on Nov 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions