Proper citation for Daft?

I couldn't find an obvious reference or citation for daft, what is the proper way to acknowledge this software in publications?

Ok, maybe I didn't look hard enough, sorry, I'm gonna go ahead and use this:
https://zenodo.org/record/3747801
Let me know if there is another preferred option :-)

Thanks Francois! That one is fine and, no, I don't think it is documented anywhere. We should add a note about that to the docs!