Upstream nightly v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318 conflicts with custom-nightly

[github-actions]

@DiegoJohnsonL merging upstream nightly v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318 into custom-nightly stopped on conflicts, so no custom build is published until they are resolved. Chamaquita resolves them and, because this issue carries automerge, merges its pull request once every check passes.

Base branch: custom-nightly
Job branch: chamaquita/upstream-v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318
Upstream tag: v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318 from https://github.com/pingdotgg/t3code.git

Conflicted files:

• apps/web/src/components/NoProjectsHero.tsx
• apps/web/src/components/chat/ComposerSurface.tsx
• apps/web/src/components/chat/MessagesTimeline.tsx
• apps/web/src/components/settings/SettingsPanels.tsx
• apps/web/src/routes/__root.tsx

Task

Do not run the repository's checks, builds, or test suites locally: GitHub CI runs them on the pull request.

1. Start chamaquita/upstream-v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318 from origin/custom-nightly, or continue it if an earlier attempt pushed it. Fetch the tag with git fetch --no-tags https://github.com/pingdotgg/t3code.git tag v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318 and merge it with git merge --no-ff v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318. Never rebase, squash, or cherry-pick: the nightly decides what is new with git merge-base --is-ancestor v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318 HEAD, so only a merge commit keeps the tag an ancestor.
2. Resolve each conflicted hunk:
   • Classify it as disjoint (the sides changed different things, so keep both), same question with different answers (pick one side on the evidence), or superseded (one side's change makes the other's moot).
   • Touch only the conflicted regions, and leave every line git merged cleanly as it is.
   • Keep the fork's customizations and take upstream's changes. The fork's intent is in git log v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318..origin/custom-nightly; upstream's is in git log origin/custom-nightly..v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318 and its pull requests.
   • Regenerate lockfiles and generated files instead of merging them by hand: take upstream's pnpm-lock.yaml and run pnpm install to reconcile it with the merged manifests.
   • Leave no conflict markers: git grep -nE '^(<<<<<<<|>>>>>>>) ' finds nothing.
3. Commit the merge, push chamaquita/upstream-v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318, and open a pull request into custom-nightly. Its body has a table with one row per conflicted hunk and the columns File:lines, Class, custom-nightly, Upstream, Kept, and Why. If a push is refused for the workflows permission, change nothing and finish blocked with that reason.
4. GitHub CI runs the fork's checks on the pull request. Chamaquita merges it as a merge commit once every check passes and GitHub finds it mergeable; if CI fails, Chamaquita hands the failures to the next attempt. The next run finds the tag merged, publishes the build, and closes this issue.

Run: https://github.com/d3labs-dev/t3code/actions/runs/36275539287

[chamaquita-d3]

Chamaquita started Attempt 1 of 2 on this issue. Follow it in Discord: https://discord.com/channels/1497356507472466022/1553530019425292330

[chamaquita-d3]

Attempt 1 of 2: Claude Code finished, waiting for GitHub CI
I merged upstream tag v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318 into custom-nightly as a --no-ff merge commit, so the tag is now an ancestor of the branch. I resolved all 6 conflicted hunks in 5 files, and all were disjoint. Where both sides only added lines (NoProjectsHero imports, SettingsPanels restore fields, and __root.tsx imports and mounts), I kept both. In ComposerSurface.tsx I kept the fork's --glass-surface glass fill. In MessagesTimeline.tsx I kept the fork's [contain:inline-size]. Both files also take upstream's new max-w-(--chat-max-width) for the chat width setting. I replaced pnpm-lock.yaml with upstream's copy and regenerated it with pnpm install --lockfile-only. No conflict markers remain. I opened PR #19, ready for review and saying 'Fixes #18', with a per-hunk table in the body. No checks were run locally; GitHub CI decides whether it automerges.
Pull request: #19
Branch: chamaquita/upstream-v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318
Chamaquita merges it once GitHub CI passes on commit b32b079. If no check has started by 22:35 UTC, or some still run at 23:15 UTC, a person takes it from there.

Discord thread: https://discord.com/channels/1497356507472466022/1553530019425292330

[chamaquita-d3]

Attempt 1 of 2 finished: flawed
I merged upstream tag v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318 into custom-nightly as a --no-ff merge commit, so the tag is now an ancestor of the branch. I resolved all 6 conflicted hunks in 5 files, and all were disjoint. Where both sides only added lines (NoProjectsHero imports, SettingsPanels restore fields, and __root.tsx imports and mounts), I kept both. In ComposerSurface.tsx I kept the fork's --glass-surface glass fill. In MessagesTimeline.tsx I kept the fork's [contain:inline-size]. Both files also take upstream's new max-w-(--chat-max-width) for the chat width setting. I replaced pnpm-lock.yaml with upstream's copy and regenerated it with pnpm install --lockfile-only. No conflict markers remain. I opened PR #19, ready for review and saying 'Fixes #18', with a per-hunk table in the body. No checks were run locally; GitHub CI decides whether it automerges.
Pull request: #19
Branch: chamaquita/upstream-v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318
GitHub CI failed on commit b32b079:

• Test: https://github.com/d3labs-dev/t3code/actions/runs/36275647434/job/108497743143
  Chamaquita starts Attempt 2 of 2 to fix the failing checks.

Discord thread: https://discord.com/channels/1497356507472466022/1553530019425292330

[chamaquita-d3]

Chamaquita started Attempt 2 of 2 on this issue because GitHub CI failed on its pull request. Follow it in Discord: https://discord.com/channels/1497356507472466022/1553530019425292330

[chamaquita-d3]

Attempt 2 of 2: Claude Code finished, waiting for GitHub CI
I pushed a fix for the one failing Test check on PR #19. The test (encodeShellSnapshotForCache, from upstream pingdotgg#13767) timed out: it builds 2000 generated snapshots, which took 6.3s on the fork's ubuntu-latest runners against vitest's default 5s limit. Upstream runs its CI on 8-vCPU Blacksmith runners. The fork doesn't change these schemas, so the timeout comes from slower runners, not a bad merge. The fix gives that one test a 30s timeout and leaves its assertions unchanged. It's in commit f2a1d6e, on top of the merge commit, so the tag is still an ancestor of the branch. I didn't run the test here because the worktree has no node_modules; the PR's CI run will show whether it now passes. I also added a note about the fix to the PR body. The PR is still open and ready for review, and it says 'Fixes #18'.
Pull request: #19
Branch: chamaquita/upstream-v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318
Chamaquita merges it once GitHub CI passes on commit f2a1d6e. If no check has started by 22:41 UTC, or some still run at 23:21 UTC, a person takes it from there.

Discord thread: https://discord.com/channels/1497356507472466022/1553530019425292330

[chamaquita-d3]

Attempt 2 of 2 finished: flawed
I pushed a fix for the one failing Test check on PR #19. The test (encodeShellSnapshotForCache, from upstream pingdotgg#13767) timed out: it builds 2000 generated snapshots, which took 6.3s on the fork's ubuntu-latest runners against vitest's default 5s limit. Upstream runs its CI on 8-vCPU Blacksmith runners. The fork doesn't change these schemas, so the timeout comes from slower runners, not a bad merge. The fix gives that one test a 30s timeout and leaves its assertions unchanged. It's in commit f2a1d6e, on top of the merge commit, so the tag is still an ancestor of the branch. I didn't run the test here because the worktree has no node_modules; the PR's CI run will show whether it now passes. I also added a note about the fix to the PR body. The PR is still open and ready for review, and it says 'Fixes #18'.
Pull request: #19
Branch: chamaquita/upstream-v0.0.43-nightly.20260926.2318
GitHub CI failed on commit f2a1d6e:

• Test: https://github.com/d3labs-dev/t3code/actions/runs/36276005173/job/108498771359
• Check: https://github.com/d3labs-dev/t3code/actions/runs/36276005173/job/108498771266
  That was Attempt 2 of 2, the last one; a person takes it from here, or asks for a Follow-up in this thread.

Discord thread: https://discord.com/channels/1497356507472466022/1553530019425292330

[github-actions]

Superseded by v0.0.43-nightly.20260927.2331.