You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on May 25, 2019. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on May 25, 2019. It is now read-only.
Hi everyone,
I started using the ui-codemirror directive a few days ago, and I have to say it is great. I however stumbled upon some refresh problems in a page with a parameter (not sure it is relevent though). What happens is that in some cases, my code is not rendered in the div where I use the directive. I have to click inside the element to have my code visible. After a bit of research, I came accross a StackOverflow post that helped me solve the problem.
I actually changed ngModel.$render (line 118 in ui-codemirror.js) to include a refresh using timeout after setValue:
I don't think it is ideal/perfect, but it works...
I will try to post a plnkr of the not-working example later, to try and give a better overview of the problem. If I manage to reproduce it clearly, I will try and submit a PR comprising this fix (if it suits you of course).
Best regards,
Hugues
Even with your patch I had the problem for codes on a hidden tab. Only on the visible tab on page load it helped correctly. A better solution seems to use the display/autorefresh.js addon from codemirror and setting autoRefresh:true in options. This solved the problem for all cases I had.
Activity
darko371 commentedon Dec 1, 2015
Even with your patch I had the problem for codes on a hidden tab. Only on the visible tab on page load it helped correctly. A better solution seems to use the display/autorefresh.js addon from codemirror and setting autoRefresh:true in options. This solved the problem for all cases I had.
Ledragon commentedon Dec 22, 2015
Thanks for the info, I will check that. My solution was more a workaround than a solution, I'm glad to hear there is a cleaner way.
Ledragon commentedon Jan 13, 2016
@repetier Your solution worked for me as well, I therefore recommend using that solution instead of what I proposed.