Skip to content

fix for #34 (Nanocube remote commands do not have siph prefix) - #36

Merged
beltoforion merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
bugs/#34-ingo-nanocube_command_fix
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

fix for #34 (Nanocube remote commands do not have siph prefix)#36
beltoforion merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
bugs/#34-ingo-nanocube_command_fix

Conversation

@beltoforion

@beltoforion beltoforion commented Jun 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • removed siph prefix from nanocube remote commands
  • added a property for the prober class to find out the sentio compatibility level
  • renamed ProbeSentio enum to ProbePosition
  • Added enumerations for mixed cardinal directions to ProbePosition enum

@IngoBergATV
fix for #34
1583805 
removed siph prefix from nanocube remote commands
added a property for the prober class to find out the sentio compatibility level
renamed ProbeSentio enum to ProbePosition
Added enumerations for mixed cardinal directions to ProbePosition enum
@beltoforion
beltoforion requested a review from Simon1224 June 16, 2025 09:59
@beltoforion beltoforion changed the title fix for #34 fix for #34 (Nanocube remote commands do not have siph prefix) Jun 16, 2025
@beltoforion
beltoforion merged commit efa01e1 into master Jun 16, 2025
@beltoforion
beltoforion deleted the bugs/#34-ingo-nanocube_command_fix branch June 16, 2025 14:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@Simon1224 Simon1224 Simon1224 approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@beltoforion @Simon1224 @IngoBergATV