Skip to content

The reproduced result is not consistent with your paper. Is there any problem ? #23

Description

@yongZheng1723

I used the train_test_IQA.py training CLIVE data set as you suggested, but the result was not the same as what you showed in your paper. The parameters were set according to the default value of the code you gave, such as EPOchs =16, etc. May I ask if you have taken the highest value of the training model for many times in your paper? Could you please explain my doubts?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions