Repository navigation
Add more types of folded arguments. #7
Description
It would be really nice to handle different type of folded arguments. Here a list of what I think could be useful. Feel free to comment or suggest other types.
Listing
- List:
echo [1 3]
echo 1
echo 3
- Range:
echo [1:4] |
echo [1:6:2] |
|---|---|
echo 1 |
echo 1 |
echo 2 |
echo 3 |
echo 3 |
echo 5 |
- Linspace:
echo Lin[1:6:5]
echo 1
echo 2.25
echo 3.5
echo 4.75
echo 6
- Logspace:
echo Log[0:3:4]
echo 1
echo 10
echo 100
echo 1000
Random sampling
- Uniform:
echo U[0,1:3]
echo 0.999
echo 0.42
echo 0
- Normal:
echo N[0,1:4]
echo 1.5
echo -0.42
echo 0.0001
echo -0.9
Activity
[-]Make the parser to handle range in argument[/-][+]Add more types of folded arguments.[/+]mgermain commentedon Jun 29, 2016
The remaining ones have been requested over and over. It's pretty simple to implement we just need to think of a nice way to put that in the command line.
mgermain commentedon Jun 29, 2016
Maybe we could unify all those like so:
[1 3] -> List(1,3)
[1:6:2] -> Range(1,6,2)
Lin[1:6:5] -> Lin(1,6,5)
N[0,1:4] -> N(0,1,4)
Not sure though.
What do you think @vdumoulin @rizar @caglar ?
MarcCote commentedon Jun 29, 2016
Maybe function names should all be lowercase?
Also should we still support [1 3] and [1:6:2] for backward compatibility?
fvisin commentedon Jul 12, 2016
My suggestion is to try to stick to the typical Python syntax as much as possible:
I don't have a strong preference on lowercase vs uppercase, but since N has to be uppercase maybe it makes sense to keep Log and Lin uppercase too.
caglar commentedon Aug 16, 2016
For me suggestions made by both @mgermain and @fvisin are good. But I think I would prefer having lower case for Lin, Log and N functions.
ieee8023 commentedon May 3, 2017
I vote for [] because bash cares about () sometimes.