Skip to content

docs(progress): sync after 2026-05-01 single-pipeline + delta + queryable e2e - #212

Merged
zzylol merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/sync-2026-05-01-progress
May 1, 2026
Merged

zzylol merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/sync-2026-05-01-progress

Conversation

@zzylol

@zzylol zzylol commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Updates `PROGRESS.md` to match the merged state after the 2026-05-01 work.

Docs only; no code changes.

…able e2e

Capture this session's merged work at the top, retire stale
follow-ups, add new ones discovered along the way.

New top section: "Single-pipeline multi-sketch + delta +
queryable warm tier (2026-05-01)" — itemises #210 (DDSketch
delta wire fixes — three connected bugs), #211 (windowed
processors pass-through so chained `[ddsketch, HLL, batch]`
works), and the companion backend PRs (#70 OTLP gRPC max msg
size, #71 store overlap filter + closest-pane + window
annotation). Live e2e capture pasted in as evidence.

Retired follow-up #1 ("Warm-tier sketch ingest is dropped at
the gateway") — superseded by the new top section. Replaced
the lingering "agent-side ddsketch→batch wiring quirk" note
that was the chain bug now fixed by #211.

Replaced the abbreviated follow-up list (#2 cold reader,
#3 reducer self-check) with the actual residual after this
session, in priority order:
  1. Run the P7 sweep + accuracy reducer over all five sketches.
  2. Backend in-memory sketch_snapshots cache loss on restart.
  3. Inference config breadth (only [1m] patterns today).
  4. Cold reader torn-line tolerance (carried over).
  5. Reducer self-check vs engine (carried over).
  6. Inline GOPRIVATE / GOTOOLCHAIN env vars in build_sketchcollector.sh.
  7. Decide on OTel submodule bumps still dirty in working tree.

Updated `_Last updated_` to 2026-05-01.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@zzylol
zzylol merged commit cd7d6d3 into main May 1, 2026
@zzylol
zzylol deleted the docs/sync-2026-05-01-progress branch May 1, 2026 17:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant