Skip to content

Prepare 1.9.2 release - #779

Closed
ilicfilip wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
filip/release-1.9.2
Closed

Prepare 1.9.2 release#779
ilicfilip wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
filip/release-1.9.2

Conversation

@ilicfilip

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Bumps the plugin version to 1.9.2 and adds the changelog entry ahead of the develop → main release PR.

Changes

  • progress-planner.php: Version: 1.9.1 → 1.9.2
  • readme.txt: Stable tag: 1.9.1 → 1.9.2 + new = 1.9.2 = changelog block

Changelog entry

  • Strengthened capability and permission checks across the plugin.
  • Added 2026 monthly badge names.
  • Confirmed compatibility with WordPress 7.1.

The develop → main release PR will follow separately.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test on Playground
Test this pull request on the Playground
or download the zip

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔍 WordPress Plugin Check Report

⚠️ Status: Passed with warnings

📊 Report

🎯 Total Issues ❌ Errors ⚠️ Warnings
10 0 10

⚠️ Warnings (10)

📁 classes/suggested-tasks/providers/class-content-review.php (4 warnings)
📍 Line 🔖 Check 💬 Message
232 WordPressVIPMinimum.Performance.WPQueryParams.PostNotIn_post__not_in Using exclusionary parameters, like post__not_in, in calls to get_posts() should be done with caution, see https://docs.wpvip.com/databases/optimize-queries/using-post__not_in/ for more information.
377 WordPressVIPMinimum.Performance.WPQueryParams.PostNotIn_post__not_in Using exclusionary parameters, like post__not_in, in calls to get_posts() should be done with caution, see https://docs.wpvip.com/databases/optimize-queries/using-post__not_in/ for more information.
381 WordPressVIPMinimum.Performance.WPQueryParams.PostNotIn_post__not_in Using exclusionary parameters, like post__not_in, in calls to get_posts() should be done with caution, see https://docs.wpvip.com/databases/optimize-queries/using-post__not_in/ for more information.
388 WordPressVIPMinimum.Performance.WPQueryParams.PostNotIn_post__not_in Using exclusionary parameters, like post__not_in, in calls to get_posts() should be done with caution, see https://docs.wpvip.com/databases/optimize-queries/using-post__not_in/ for more information.
📁 classes/suggested-tasks/data-collector/class-unpublished-content.php (1 warning)
📍 Line 🔖 Check 💬 Message
103 WordPressVIPMinimum.Performance.WPQueryParams.PostNotIn_post__not_in Using exclusionary parameters, like post__not_in, in calls to get_posts() should be done with caution, see https://docs.wpvip.com/databases/optimize-queries/using-post__not_in/ for more information.
📁 classes/suggested-tasks/data-collector/class-yoast-orphaned-content.php (1 warning)
📍 Line 🔖 Check 💬 Message
111 PluginCheck.Security.DirectDB.UnescapedDBParameter Unescaped parameter $query used in $wpdb->get_row()\n$query assigned unsafely at line 98.
📁 classes/suggested-tasks/data-collector/class-terms-without-description.php (1 warning)
📍 Line 🔖 Check 💬 Message
108 PluginCheck.Security.DirectDB.UnescapedDBParameter Unescaped parameter $query used in $wpdb->get_results()\n$query assigned unsafely at line 106.
📁 classes/suggested-tasks/data-collector/class-terms-without-posts.php (1 warning)
📍 Line 🔖 Check 💬 Message
120 PluginCheck.Security.DirectDB.UnescapedDBParameter Unescaped parameter $query used in $wpdb->get_results()\n$query assigned unsafely at line 118.
📁 classes/activities/class-query.php (2 warnings)
📍 Line 🔖 Check 💬 Message
71 PluginCheck.Security.DirectDB.UnescapedDBParameter Unescaped parameter $table_name used in $wpdb->query()\n$table_name assigned unsafely at line 58.
163 PluginCheck.Security.DirectDB.UnescapedDBParameter Unescaped parameter $where_args used in $wpdb->get_results()\n$where_args assigned unsafely at line 153.

🤖 Generated by WordPress Plugin Check Action • Learn more about Plugin Check

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Sep 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ Code Coverage Report

Metric Value
Total Coverage 32.26% 📉
Base Coverage 32.26%
Difference 📈 0.00%

⚠️ Coverage below recommended 40% threshold

🎉 Great job maintaining/improving code coverage!

ℹ️ About this report
  • All tests run in a single job with Xdebug coverage
  • Security tests excluded from coverage to prevent output issues
  • Coverage calculated from line coverage percentages

@ilicfilip

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Closing — the security hardening (#775, #778) is already on develop and will ship as part of the 1.10.0 release instead of a separate 1.9.2 patch. Version bump + changelog will be handled on the 1.10.0 release.

@ilicfilip ilicfilip closed this Sep 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant