Skip to content

Add support for select pseudo stats in trader weights - #10085

Merged
LocalIdentity merged 2 commits into
PathOfBuildingCommunity:devfrom
vaisest:pseudo-trader
Aug 6, 2026
Merged

Add support for select pseudo stats in trader weights#10085
LocalIdentity merged 2 commits into
PathOfBuildingCommunity:devfrom
vaisest:pseudo-trader

Conversation

@vaisest

@vaisest vaisest commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description of the problem being solved:

This PR tries to solve the problem of having a lot of duplicate stats in the trader weights, which is a pretty big problem in PoE1 since there is an insane amount of mods. This is done by adding hardcoded mappings for single resist and attribute stats, and by banning the equivalent hybrid stats.

This already does quite a lot, but I think it would be a good to have more things since duplicating e.g. enchant + implicit + explicit a bit silly. However, there are some problems there. Firstly any overlap between different pseudo mods will inflate the result score. For example pseudo life + pseudo strength is not correct. Secondly there are garbage mods like the conditional eldritch mods which would count in pseudo stats.

Steps taken to verify a working solution:

  • Test added
  • Stats deduped
  • Hybrid stats nuked

Link to a build that showcases this PR:

Before screenshot:

After screenshot:

image

@vaisest vaisest changed the title Add support for selected pseudo stats in trader weights Add support for select pseudo stats in trader weights Aug 1, 2026
@vaisest
vaisest marked this pull request as ready for review August 5, 2026 19:44
@LocalIdentity
LocalIdentity merged commit 5fd9b09 into PathOfBuildingCommunity:dev Aug 6, 2026
3 checks passed
@LocalIdentity LocalIdentity added the enhancement New feature, calculation, or mod label Aug 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature, calculation, or mod

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants