You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Application can crash if linked against both libppd and libcups #52
CUPS, on its sources, implements (duplicates implementation) of some, but not all, libppd functions, and exports them from the libcups.so library.
For example, the ppdOpenFd and ppdClose functions are exported from the libcups.so, while ppdLoadAttributes is not.
If the application is linked against both libcups.so and libppd.so libraries, the following scenario is possible:
application calls ppdOpenFd from the libcups.so
application calls ppdLoadAttributes, and this call is now goes into the libppd.so library. This function modifies the ppd_file_t structure, but the definition of this type is not exactly the same between these two libraries (the actual difference seems to be in the ppd_cache_t in the libppd vs _ppd_cache_s in the libcups.so)
application calls ppdClose and this call goes to the libcups.so and crashes there in attempt to destroy the _ppd_cache_s structure, which was actually created in the libppd.so
The exact behaviour depends on a link order; if libppd is linked first, everything is OK, while if libcups is linked first, application crashed.
I've caught this issue at Fedora 40 with cups-2.4.11-1.fc40.x86_64 and libppd-2.1~b1-2.fc40.x86_64 packages installed, but most likely it may affect other distros and other version.
It is hard to say what could be a perfect solution for this problem, because libcups header files announces exporting many ppdXXX functions, so this is a part of the libcups public API. And without linking of the libcups.so the libppd.so functions that use ipp_t and ipp_attribute_t become unusable, because these types are opaque and accessible only via libcups.so-exported API...
What if we mark all duplicated symbols as weak at the libcups.so and somewhere document this behaviour change?
If it breaks something, it will (at the first glance) break only apps that really and intentionally use mix of the overlapping APIs from the both libraries, which is incorrect and extremely dangerous by itself.
It is not a perfect solution, but it least it will make things deterministic and result will not depend on a link order.
Again, libcups.so.2 (CUPS 2.x libcups) always has the PPD functions in it. Any notion of doing weak linkage (not supported on all CUPS platforms) is incorrect since libcups is the original library.
Either libppd should rename its functions or it should not include them when building on a system with CUPS 2.x since libcups will provide them.
@alexpevzner Note that libppd is putting together the PPD-related API functions of libcups, the functions needed for the PPD compiler (*.drv -> *.ppd) utilities, functions of cups-driverd (for PPD collection handling), and making some internal libcups functions public API. There are also added several new functions. This is all clearly marked in ppd/ppd.h, in the part of the function prototypes at the end. There I have also told for what the new functions are good for and from where in CUPS 2.x they come from.
@tillkamppeter One thing you could do here is change the main header to have a block of defines that rename the functions to names that don't conflict with libcups, e.g.:
Activity
michaelrsweet commentedon Nov 9, 2024
You have that backwards - libppd implements libcups functions.
alexpevzner commentedon Nov 10, 2024
What if we mark all duplicated symbols as weak at the
libcups.soand somewhere document this behaviour change?If it breaks something, it will (at the first glance) break only apps that really and intentionally use mix of the overlapping APIs from the both libraries, which is incorrect and extremely dangerous by itself.
It is not a perfect solution, but it least it will make things deterministic and result will not depend on a link order.
michaelrsweet commentedon Nov 10, 2024
Again, libcups.so.2 (CUPS 2.x libcups) always has the PPD functions in it. Any notion of doing weak linkage (not supported on all CUPS platforms) is incorrect since libcups is the original library.
Either libppd should rename its functions or it should not include them when building on a system with CUPS 2.x since libcups will provide them.
alexpevzner commentedon Nov 11, 2024
I don't see any equivalent of the
ppdLoadAttributesfunction in thelibcups.so...michaelrsweet commentedon Nov 11, 2024
@alexpevzner It is called
_ppdCacheCreateWithFilein libcups.so.2...tillkamppeter commentedon Nov 11, 2024
@alexpevzner Note that libppd is putting together the PPD-related API functions of libcups, the functions needed for the PPD compiler (
*.drv->*.ppd) utilities, functions of cups-driverd (for PPD collection handling), and making some internal libcups functions public API. There are also added several new functions. This is all clearly marked inppd/ppd.h, in the part of the function prototypes at the end. There I have also told for what the new functions are good for and from where in CUPS 2.x they come from.michaelrsweet commentedon Nov 11, 2024
@tillkamppeter One thing you could do here is change the main header to have a block of defines that rename the functions to names that don't conflict with libcups, e.g.: