Repository navigation
Update TypeScript to latest stable version #28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "extends": "./tsconfig.json", | ||
| "compilerOptions": { | ||
| "declaration": true, | ||
| "inlineSources": true, | ||
| "noEmit": false, | ||
| "outDir": "dist", | ||
| "rootDir": "src", | ||
| "sourceMap": true | ||
| }, | ||
| "include": ["./src/**/*.ts"] | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,16 +1,16 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "compilerOptions": { | ||
| "declaration": true, | ||
| "esModuleInterop": true, | ||
| "inlineSources": true, | ||
| "exactOptionalPropertyTypes": true, | ||
| "forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": true, | ||
| "lib": ["DOM", "ES2020"], | ||
| "module": "CommonJS", | ||
| "moduleResolution": "Node", | ||
| "outDir": "dist", | ||
| "rootDir": "src", | ||
| "sourceMap": true, | ||
| "moduleResolution": "node", | ||
| "noEmit": true, | ||
| "noErrorTruncation": true, | ||
| "noUncheckedIndexedAccess": true, | ||
| "strict": true, | ||
| "target": "ES2017" | ||
| "target": "es2017" | ||
| }, | ||
| "include": ["src/**/*.ts"] | ||
| "exclude": ["./dist/**/*"] | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This entire function could be replaced with
bytesToHexfrom@metamask/utils.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice! I'm tempted to leave this inline for now until we migrate this into the monorepo, to avoid the dependency bloat problem of having incompatible util library versions (the monorepo basically solves this by making it possible for them to be kept in sync). I'll create an issue for this though, thanks for pointing it out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#30
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could make it a peer dependency if you don't want dependency bloat? The version in the extension has the bytes functions already, a lot of functions in this library could be replaced.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The dependency bloat problem I had in mind was where we need multiple different copies due to major version updates of the utils package, which leaves us with multiple copies unless we're very diligent with updating all packages that use utils (sometimes with can take up to 4 levels of coordinated releases). Adding it as a peer dependency just moves that problem up one level. With the monorepo we are planning on using a Yarn constraint to ensure we have compatible versions across the board.
I've been holding off on replacing internal functions with utils across various different packages for this reason. The monorepo should land tomorrow or Monday though, and I am hoping that migrating a package into it will be a straightforward process. So we may be able to migrate this into the monorepo as early as next week.