Analysis of rice production-side efficiency across Decision Making Units (DMUs) in West Java, Indonesia.
The dataset are obtained from Mendeley Data
The project evaluates how efficiently each DMU converts land and production input costs into production value. Although the dataset is related to the rice supply chain, the available variables primarily represent production-side inputs and output value.
therefore, this project does not cover downstream logistics, storage, milling, distribution, or market dynamics.
The analysis focuses on:
- Comparing DMU economic and production efficiency.
- Understanding the relationship between input costs and production value.
- Evaluating production and cost efficiency relative to land area.
- Comparing economic performance across regencies.
- Identifying groups of DMUs with similar production characteristics.
- Building predictive models for production value.
Statistical hypothesis testing is used to determine whether production performance differs across regencies.
-
Kruskal-Wallis Test: The Kruskal-Wallis H test is used as a non-parametric test for comparing the distribution of the selected performance metric across multiple regency groups.
-
Dunn's Post-Hoc Test: When a significant group-level difference is identified, Dunn's post-hoc test with Holm p-value adjustment is used to determine which groups differ from each other.
Statistical decisions are evaluated using a significance level of alpha = 0.05.
OLS regression is used to estimate the association between production input costs and production value while controlling for the other cost variables.
The model uses:
- Target: Production value.
- Predictors: Total input cost & Land area in m^2
- Inference: regression coefficients, standard errors, t-statistics, and p-values.
Production value prediction is evaluated using multiple regression approaches:
- Linear Regression (Baseline)
- XGBoost Regressor
- Random Forest Regressor
For the tree-based models, Random Forest and XGBoost are statistically compared using a paired t-test. The test compares the fold-level cross-validation RMSE scores of the best-performing hyperparameter configuration from each model.
K-Means clustering is used to segment DMUs based on production scale and economic characteristics.
The appropriate number of clusters is evaluated using both the Elbow Method and the Silhouette Score. The Elbow Method helps identify where adding more clusters gives diminishing improvement, while the Silhouette Score measures how well-separated and internally consistent the clusters are.
A higher Silhouette Score indicates better cluster separation. The final number of clusters is selected by considering both the elbow point and the silhouette score.