You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 21, 2026. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 21, 2026. It is now read-only.
[Bug] - thickness_calculator[0].location_tracking unit assignment #181
the unit field is off by one stratigraphic unit (e.g. the unit in location tracker says Pyradie Formation, but the actual unit according to the map is Boongal Formation (in the Hammersley example dataset) which is one unit below the Pyradie
Minimal reproducible example
using hammersley mode, export location_tracking data using:
Here is an image of part of the area to help explain the problem (mid-point unit names in black; polygon formation names in blue)
In addition, in the lower part of the map something else seems to have gone wrong as the midpoints bear little relationship to local contact geometries
Activity
markjessell commentedon Mar 19, 2025
Here is an image of part of the area to help explain the problem (mid-point unit names in black; polygon formation names in blue)
In addition, in the lower part of the map something else seems to have gone wrong as the midpoints bear little relationship to local contact geometries
lachlangrose commentedon May 1, 2025
@markjessell is this using the structure point calculator or the interpolated structures?
markjessell commentedon May 1, 2025
lachlangrose commentedon May 1, 2025
@markjessell I've pushed a fix int fix/interpolated-thicknesses branch can you test it to see if it is doing what you expect.