Skip to content

Use BigInt parameter in 16gb-wasm-memory tests - #3696

Merged
kenrussell merged 1 commit into
KhronosGroup:mainfrom
backes:patch-1
Oct 4, 2024
Merged

Use BigInt parameter in 16gb-wasm-memory tests#3696
kenrussell merged 1 commit into
KhronosGroup:mainfrom
backes:patch-1

Conversation

@backes

@backes backes commented Oct 2, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The JS API for Memory was updated in WebAssembly/memory64#68 to require BigInt parameters.

@CLAassistant

CLAassistant commented Oct 2, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@kenrussell kenrussell left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this contribution. In the description, is it more accurate to say "...to require BigInt parameters when the Memory type is i64"?

If so - looks good to me as long as we update the message when this is merged.

Could we also say "Associated with Chromium bug crbug.com/370792790" in the description when merging? Welcome to mention any other browser bugs too.

Thanks in advance.

The JS API for Memory was updated in
WebAssembly/memory64#68 to require BigInt
parameters when the Memory type is i64.

Also see chromium-side failures (https://crbug.com/370792790).
@backes

backes commented Oct 4, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Ack, I updated the commit message. Feel free to merge this any time.

@kenrussell

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Discussed this in the WebGL WG meeting of 2024-10-03; as long as this is following the WebAssembly spec and has been tested in one implementation it seems fine to merge.

@kenrussell
kenrussell merged commit 450cceb into KhronosGroup:main Oct 4, 2024
@backes
backes deleted the patch-1 branch October 7, 2024 10:55
@backes backes mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants