Skip to content

README doesn't cover how the simulator decides which transactions are fraudulent #41

Description

@richsanchezalexander

Two follow-ups, both about the generator rather than the data itself:

  1. Is there a description anywhere of how the simulator decides which
    transactions are fraudulent? The README doesn't cover it and I
    couldn't find it in the ICASSP paper.

  2. Related: online transactions ("ONLINE" merchant city) are 40x more
    likely to be fraud in 2015-16, but 5x LESS likely in 2018-19. That
    reversal is large enough that a model trained on the earlier period
    learns an inverted rule. Did the generation logic change between
    those periods?

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions