Android GitHub sign-in still fails on the v1.0.3 APK: the relay serving /v/1.0.2 predates the #3253 fix by 5 days #3294

Summary

A second independent reporter here. I installed the freshly published v1.0.3 APK on a clean device and GitHub sign-in still fails with the exact same red message. This is the same symptom reported in #3246 and reproduced by @tecgic today.

The new APK is a genuine new build (I verified the dex contents, see below), so this is not a case of "you installed the old file". The reason it cannot help is server-side, and the evidence is unambiguous: the relay process currently serving /v/1.0.2 started 5.24 days before the fix in #3253 was merged, so it physically cannot contain that fix.

Environment

Note the OS differs from the earlier reports in #3246 (Android 15), so this is not an Android-version-specific regression.

What was installed

Asset OpenBitFun-1.0.0-beta.apk from release v1.0.3, uploaded 2026-10-08T01:41:00Z:

size   4624246
sha256 9e1bb7016a2e53ebde9fa4d6f1bfe6064d054f78320871be68a962dfdc0833a5

This is byte-for-byte the same size as the v1.0.2 asset (02d4dfe10933d6120479c38aef09a9a686f34a9b3a6d29da0228b38e06198648), which is what makes it easy to doubt. It is nevertheless a different binary. Comparing the two downloaded APKs locally:

And these strings exist only in the v1.0.3 build:

#account host visibility foreground=
%account authorization callback wakeup
authorization poll attempt=
openbitfun-auth-diagnostics.log

So yes, the client-side half of #3253 / #3262 is genuinely present. Confirming @tecgic's observation: because AndroidManifest.xml and resources.arsc are byte-identical between the two assets, versionName never changed and the user still sees 1.0.0 Beta. There is no way for a user to tell the two builds apart from the file name or the About screen. That is worth fixing on its own: a commit short sha in the asset name, or a build number displayed in-app, would have saved this whole exchange.

The APK still targets the old relay path

Both builds hardcode the same base URL:

v1.0.2 asset -> https://remote.openbitfun.com/v/1.0.2
v1.0.3 asset -> https://remote.openbitfun.com/v/1.0.2

So even a perfect client build lands on the v1.0.2 path, which is exactly the path served by the stale process.

Relay measurements (2026-10-08T07:05Z)

GET /v/1.0.2/api/info
{"name":"OpenBitFun Relay Server","version":"1.0.1","protocol_version":3,
 "capabilities":["device_alias_v1","device_metadata_v1","device_client_build_v1","device_kind_cli_v1"]}

GET /v/1.0.2/health
{"status":"healthy","version":"1.0.1","uptime_seconds":1211368,...}

GET /v/1.0.3/api/info  -> HTTP 410 (nginx)
GET /v/1.0.3/health    -> HTTP 410 (nginx)

uptime_seconds: 1211368 at 2026-10-08T07:05Z places the process start at 2026-09-24T06:35:50Z.

#3253 was merged on 2026-09-29T12:26:23Z.

The running process predates the fix by 5.24 days. This is not a mis-tagged image or a skipped backport: the process was already up when the code was written. @tecgic reached the same conclusion from capabilities and uptime; the version: "1.0.1" field is consistent with this because relay-service read CARGO_PKG_VERSION 1.0.1 on main until the 1.0.2 bump on 2026-09-25.

I also confirmed the fix is not present in the older tags, which is what makes the deploy the deciding factor:

Why no APK can fix this

The client still has no recovery path for the consumed status, as @tecgic noted when re-reading AccountStore.kt on main. AuthorizationPoll.awaitAccessToken only branches on authorized, expired and denied. The 900 second replay cache added by #3253 lives entirely on the relay. Only a relay redeploy closes this, and it requires no app change at all.

Request

1. Restart / rebuild the relay from a commit that includes fix(mobile): make account sign-in recovery reliable #3253, and serve it on a path the released APK actually uses. Since the published APK targets /v/1.0.2, either redeploy that path with the new build, or publish /v/1.0.3 (currently 410) and ship an APK pointing at it. The first option fixes already-installed APKs with zero client action.
2. Optionally, consider handling consumed client-side so a lost poll response is recoverable without depending on the relay cache window.

Reference: the original analysis is in #3246 (now closed), and the relay-side fix is #3253.