Skip to content

chore: add issue templates with FAQ/Roadmap checks and auto-labels - #375

Merged
jason-fxz merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/issue-templates
Sep 4, 2026
Merged

chore: add issue templates with FAQ/Roadmap checks and auto-labels#375
jason-fxz merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/issue-templates

Conversation

@jason-fxz

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Adds issue templates (Desktop bug, Engine bug, Support Model Checkpoint, Feature request) that require checking the FAQ (#84) and Roadmap (#79) first, plus a workflow that labels issues from the form answers. Also replaces the expired Discord invite in CONTRIBUTING.md.

@jason-fxz
jason-fxz merged commit 86214a9 into main Sep 4, 2026
MT-z added a commit to MT-z/FreeToken that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2026
…QuantConfig scheme reader

This stack was cut at 86214a9 (FlashML-org#375). Upstream has since replaced the qwen3_5_moe dense
reader with one road through the QuantConfig (FlashML-org#438, squashed at 0ffd5c8), so the vision work
has to sit on top of that reader rather than the old cascade.

Three files conflicted, and all three resolve the same way: take upstream's side whole, then
put the vision line back.

config.py: the quant-detection cascade collapses into _expert_quant(hf_config, text); the
vision_config block above it stays, and vision_config=vision_cfg still reaches ModelConfig.
The result is byte-identical to try/all's.

model.py: ParallelLMHead now takes quant_config=config.quant instead of the lm_head_quant
special case. Take that, keep `self.visual = ... if config.is_multimodal else None`.

weight.py: took origin/main's file and re-applied the vision delta -- _rename regains
include_vision, threaded from config.is_multimodal through _iter_shards, and visual.* is
yielded straight rather than through the reader. That delta is byte-identical to the one on
try/all: this branch and try/all had the same vision threading in weight.py before the merge
(git diff over the vision lines is empty).

Assisted-by: Claude Opus 5
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant