Skip to content

test(attestation): verify simulator trust-root isolation - #880

Merged
kvinwang merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/fix-verifier-development-trust-label
Aug 5, 2026
Merged

test(attestation): verify simulator trust-root isolation#880
kvinwang merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
codex/fix-verifier-development-trust-label

Conversation

@kvinwang

@kvinwang kvinwang commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Problem

The simulator acceptance test previously expected product code to label verified evidence as simulated. That duplicated trust policy in business logic even though verification already depends on the verifier's selected root CA.

Fix

Test the actual security boundary instead:

  • verify simulator evidence with the exact case-owned development roots;
  • verify the identical evidence again with the verifier library's built-in production roots;
  • require production-root verification to reject it.

No simulator marker or conditional product behavior is added.

Changed path

  • dstack/tests/e2e/attestation/run-platform.sh

Verification

  • bash -n dstack/tests/e2e/attestation/run-platform.sh
  • git diff --check

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 31, 2026 02:56

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@kvinwang kvinwang changed the title fix(verifier): label development trust evidence test(attestation): verify simulator trust-root isolation Aug 4, 2026
@kvinwang
kvinwang merged commit f130fff into master Aug 5, 2026
15 checks passed
kvinwang added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
…ttestation

[STACKED on #880] feat(simulator): add deterministic seeded attestations
@kvinwang
kvinwang deleted the codex/fix-verifier-development-trust-label branch August 7, 2026 13:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants