Skip to content

Database downloads old version #7

Description

@javastraat

hoi

de tyt en ook de andere tools downloaden de oude database en niet de database-beta
zou jij aub hierna willen kijken en nieuwe versies kunnen bakken ?

raar dat niemand dit opgemerkt heeft

thanx 73 Einstein

Activity

  1. baxterdmutt commented on Jun 21, 2023

    @baxterdmutt

    I don’t know if this helps but the windows flash tools “TyteraFlashTool” and the other windows tools show as being updated 4 years ago. Those are the apps I’ve tried using and I don’t think they are getting updated.

  2. javastraat commented on Jun 21, 2023

    @javastraat
    CollaboratorAuthor

    the apps wont get updated it the db they pull, but it seems that they pull from the database and not database-beta
    the app downloads the raw file from github

  3. baxterdmutt commented on Jun 21, 2023

    @baxterdmutt
  4. javastraat commented on Jun 21, 2023

    @javastraat
    CollaboratorAuthor

    symlink in github ? ok, but there is/was already new versions. soi uploaded the latest tyt version to this github. i verified that it downloads the latest db, can you verify this ?

  5. baxterdmutt commented on Jun 21, 2023

    @baxterdmutt

    Excellent! Thank you very much. Sorry about posting in the wrong place 3 times! My bad!!!

    Do you have an update for the others as well in case someone downloads and tries using them? I’m only assuming that since they are 4 years old they are grabbing the wrong DB also.

  6. javastraat commented on Jun 21, 2023

    @javastraat
    CollaboratorAuthor

    np, yeap new versions coming up for the other ones :) just wanted to fix yours first :)
    ill leave this post open till all are fixxed

  7. PD1LOI commented on Jun 21, 2023

    @PD1LOI
    Contributor
  8. baxterdmutt commented on Jun 21, 2023

    @baxterdmutt

    I’m sorry to say that now the db is correct it will not write to the radio. Nothing happens when I click “Flash UserDB” I went back to the 2.00 and put the db there and that version writes.
    also for some reason when I use the 2.00 to write the db (the one from database-beta) all the users are written to the md390, but after the whole procedure is complete, none get written to the md390. Version 2.00 writes the old ok

  9. javastraat commented on Jun 24, 2023

    @javastraat
    CollaboratorAuthor

    i think this has todo something (maybe) with the Cyrillic characters. :(
    still investigating

  10. baxterdmutt commented on Jun 29, 2023

    @baxterdmutt

    Could this be the memory space in the MD380. I don’t recall if it’s space is the same as the MD390 or if the 380 has less room.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

bugSomething isn't working

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions